• MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    They, and also this meme, make the mistake of equating fewer cars with no cars.

    Cars can and do access pedestrians places, but when doing so reduce speed to a crawl. They can and do do this in order to pick up or drop off large objects, or when transporting the disabled.

    The same way pedestrians can use roads, cars can access pedestrians places as long as they are built wide enough, when needed.

    No part of building primarily for pedestrians use requires that cars never be used, it simply means you build based on the fact that the vast majority of the time, they aren’t needed. And that as such, they should be a secondary, not the primary, consideration.

  • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    How can you mention all those weird variations of bikes without mentioning a normal bike?

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Also, no one’s saying you can’t have commercial delivery trucks or tool trucks for construction/maintenance.

  • Fisk400@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    The bottom does not adress the top question.

    You can’t really have a firetruck train unless you build every single building within spitting distance of the train station and you can strap the firefighting equipment to a bike.

    There are reasonable solutions to this question but this meme does not provide any of them.

    This feels more like a parody of a fuckcars poster.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Only allow” implies that either way emergency vehicles are allowed. In no reading of the meme were emergency vehicles ever banned.

      • Fisk400@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        In that case the meme is just incoherent. Top part is entirely unrelated to the bottom and the title in unrelated to the meme. It’s just bright colors on a screen at that point.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      IMO the meme is mocking those who think vehicles are only car-shaped objects, in light of cities imposing restrictions on personal motor vehicle use in built up areas

      I doubt it has anything to do with emergency services being restricted to the vehicles shown lol…

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I agree, emergency vehicles could still service a lot of pedestrian and cycle access areas if they are designed for it. Many pedestrian areas even allow delivery vehicles in at slow speeds to some businesses and vehicles for garbage, trailers for renovations and other access could be permited as needed.

        Things like renovating a roof or delivering an industrial fridge to a restaurant often still require truck access, we just aren’t gonna let everyone drive a truck to the front door just to buy a dozen cookies.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Emergency vehicles are clearly mentioned in the top text, that person just misunderstood it and now can’t take the L and they’re throwing around the R-slur whilst accusing other people of resorting to base insults.

    • Muffi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just imagine the speed that firetrucks will be able to weave through cities when there are no stupid fucking cars. On top of the improved air quality, this will save countless lives.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s a parody if you’re so defensive you misunderstand the difference between a personal vehicle and a firetruck, I suppose.

      When the big street near me turns pedestrian there’s always bollard access for delivery vehicles to all the shops. They aren’t the huge, permanent kind but the sorta that a firetruck or ambulance could absolutely plow right through. Traffic going perpendicular is slow enough that they don’t need to be there for safety so it works super well.

      Basically every argument against the idea that maybe cars don’t need to be on every single street requires an astounding level of ignorance and an equal amount of desire to not change that lack of knowledge. Just let it happen, it’s ok.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You can’t really have a firetruck train unless you build every single building within spitting distance of the train station

      That’s a great point. Dense infrastructure development makes fire prevention service much cheaper and easier to deliver

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Seeing a firetruck or ambulance go down an nyc street at 5 miles an hour is disgusting. If it were a wide foot/bike path and an alert system installed, pedestrians and bike riders would be able to clear the way faster than the oversized svu carrying two people.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Probably not a good idea to fill those valleys with tones of fuel exhaust and build a bunch of tiny roads prone to mudslides.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I love showing up to work or formal events drenched in sweat. I love it. Especially when it’s 37C out.

        • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          “Let’s destroy where we live, locally and cosmically, because seeing sweaty people or being sweaty makes me psychologically uncomfortable.”

          – you

      • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t think biking for personal reasons to be an issue. 10-15 minutes of biking, do a bit of healthy exercise (even if uphill) and you’re done.

        But asking people to work on bikes all day while carrying/delivering heavy loads and/or people in the back.

        Not even talking about weather conditions: cold snowy winters, hot summers, rainy days, etc.

        Sounds a bit unreasonable.

        • Pablo M.U. :vericol:@col.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          @thefrankring A lot of people in my city carry goods constantly on cargo bikes. A lot of people have taxi-bikes with which they carry people. Even though we have constant heavy rains.

          Not because they’re forced to, but because we have good bike infrastructure.

          • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I don’t think bike infrastructure to be that good where I live, and I don’t think it’s realistic.

            Mostly because biking only happens during the summer where the weather is enjoyable outside.

            Unless you purposefully use winter bikes with appropriate fat tires. It’s also very cold during the winter.

            • Strykker@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Go talk to Norway about biking in the winter, they do it plenty with standard bikes. It’s not like once it snows roads and paths have a permanent layer of snow and ice on them, we invented this thing called a plow.

              Also like 3 minutes into biking in the cold you aren’t cold anymore.

  • FatCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    WABAALUBADUUBDUUB MORTY!!! I MADE A LIVABLE CITYY!! IM LIVABLE CITY RIIICK!!!