• emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      But Rich people and corporations have more money, so that means they’re paying more taxes? Right? Right? No don’t look at their returns, just trust them.

  • lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Easy: the latter has a lobby, the former doesn’t.
    Next question

    • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why is the general public so vulnerable to disinformation when it’s so easy to look things up?

      • Signtist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 months ago

        Why look something up when you already know the answer? So long as you make the average person confident enough in their own ability to discern the truth - which isn’t hard, given most people’s desire to feel smart - you can get them to accept an enormous amount of misinformation at face value.

        • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think you’re right, just a small point because you seem to be conflating misinformation and disinformation. It doesn’t matter here because your answer works for both, but they are not the same thing:

          Disinformation: the person spreading it knows it’s not true, is spread for a specific purpose

          Misinformation: the person spreading it thinks it’s true, is spread because people honestly believe it

          Disinformation becomes misinformation as it spreads if successful, as the people hearing it believe it and repeat it.

          • Signtist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh, good to know! I hadn’t made that distinction in my mind, but it makes perfect sense. Thanks for setting me straight!

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mainly because people in general aren’t into looking things up, and in the modern era of the Web of Lies it’s not always obvious to everyone what is factual information.

        Humans are NOT inherently rational creatures, we have to LEARN and PRACTICE how to be rational and curb our instincts in order for it to be effective. This takes discipline and self-examination.

        FEW people live a self-examined life, vanishingly few.

        Most people are rather content to go on believing what they’ve always believed and what their families raise them to believe, and are very unpleasant when what they believe is exposed as bullshit.

        • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          We’re meant to live in groups of like 50 or something, and trusting elders made sense because their survival was tied to the survival of everyone in the group.

          Now we’re in groups of millions and still believing what people of authority have to say because “why would they lead us astray? Surely their survival depends on our ability to thrive, too? Right? Guys?”

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Easy: the latter has a lobby bought and captured government, the former doesn’t. Next question

      It’s kind of the same thing, but not entirely.

  • BurnedDonut@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because students don’t pay lobbies to bribe politician. I thought this is a well known fact about the politics.

  • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because one is stimulating the economy and the other one is just more money in the pocket of the billionaires.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because the Republican Party is still sucking Reagan’s dick. The thought process is if we eliminate all taxes for businesses they will be so grateful they will pay workers more and reduce prices which in turn will stimulate the economy because Americans will spend more because everything is so cheap.

    Your average American is so gullible they still believe this bullshit to this day.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think it all boils down to elasticity - conservatives seem unaware that it even exists. So they think that every dollar a business pays in taxes/wages will go towards higher prices, and every dollar of UBI will go towards higher rents. When leftists say “profit”, conservatives hear “revenue”.

      And when you try to educate them about it, they pivot to an argument against basic econ 101.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 months ago

    The PPP program forgave more than 700 billion in loans. But the $50k I took to become a fucking teacher, well by George I better pay up.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      The PPP program tried to hand me a forgivable “loan” of $250,000 for a company that had only ever had a total of 4 employees, that I had shut down 2 years previously. I seriously considered taking the money…

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 months ago

    Really the problem is that everyone wonders how to pay for a stimulus to poor people, and worry about it causing inflation.

    But stimulus to rich people “pays for itself.”

  • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because of class warfare, plain and simple.

    According to the owner class a single mother getting food stamps is a drain on the economy whereas corporate welfare is considered 'a sound investment in our nation’s future.

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Always irked me, the term “trickle down”. It implies the masses are only deserving of whatever slips through from the ceiling above…

      “Look, kids! This slow drip from the ceiling under this lake has created a small puddle. In thousands of years from now, this puddle will be much larger. Possibly a pond! Imagine that, a pond!”

      “But you said there’s a lake above us?”

      “That’s a private lake. Trespassers will be shot.”

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You’re talking about changing real people’s lives. Giving entire generations back the wealth stolen from them.

    Sorry can’t help you. We need to focus on the “economy.” Whats that you say, the economy is held up by college educated working class people? No, no, wrong economy. We need to help the “economy” cough wealthy bankers cough because they give mehavecontrol… uhh distribute? all the money.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    It is a stimulus. It stimulates the trickle-down part of “trickle-down economics.”

    You should feel it hit your forehead any minute now… keep your mouth closed.