edit: I have changed my title to match the new NYTimes headline. Sorry about the all caps, I guess they are really excited about this lol

Also shoutout to @SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone who shared a gift article link in the comments. I hope you don’t mind but I kinda stole it and updated the post

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    3 months ago

    If he is guilty on even a single count, the former president and the presumptive republican nominee for the White House will not be able to vote for himself

    What a shit show the Republican party has become.

  • dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 months ago

    One way or the other, it will be historic. This is much faster than I expected the Jury to deliberate.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I assume if they have a verdict it’s guilty. Could be wrong.

      Edit: update convicted on all 34 counts. From the article’s update:

      Mr. Trump was convicted on all 34 counts of falsifying business recordsby a jury of 12 New Yorkers, who deliberated over two days to reach a decision in a case rife with descriptions of secret deals, tabloid scandal and an Oval Office pact with echoes of Watergate. The jury found that Mr. Trump had faked records to conceal the purpose of money given to his onetime fixer, Michael D. Cohen. The false records disguised the payments as ordinary legal expenses when in truth, Mr. Trump was reimbursing Mr. Cohen for a $130,000 hush-money deal the fixer struck with the porn star Stormy Daniels to silence her account of a sexual liaison with Mr. Trump.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Lock her him up!

      We even have signs that will work for this occasion with a slight modification.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is going to give a lot of GOP Senators a fig leaf.

      If someone puts a motion in Congress to make it illegal for him to run, a lot of them will vote for it.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I absolutely do not want a ban on felons running for President. In some countries, that is used as a political tool to eliminate political opponents. Putin used that against Navalny.

        https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42479909

        Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny has been formally barred from competing in next year’s presidential election.

        The Central Electoral Commission has said Mr Navalny was ineligible because of a corruption conviction which he says is politically motivated.

        He has urged his supporters to boycott the March vote.

        Mr Navalny, 41, was widely regarded as the only candidate with a chance of challenging President Vladimir Putin.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Before all this started, people did make claims that they wouldn’t vote for him if he was convicted.

      But then they also said they wouldn’t vote for him even if Nikki Haley conceded.

      So we’ll see, I guess. But I’m not optimistic.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      It will most matter for undecided voters who required a guilty verdict to decide, althoigh I’m not sure that is a large number in swing states.

      It won’t matter for his base that already ignore reality.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It gives us something new to troll those miserable asshats over. “Interesting argument, but have you considered the fact that your candidate is a convicted felon?”

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes: To them this demonstrates that the justice system is corrupt and they think only Trump can fix it.

      They will believe this even though Trump isn’t running for any office in New York 🤣

    • Tucker Carlson responded to today’s verdict in what can only be described as an apocalyptic tone, stating on X that the jury’s decision marked “the end of the fairest justice system in the world.” The former Fox News host said that Trump would still win the election “if he’s not killed first,” and closed by saying that “anyone who defends this verdict is a danger to you and your family.”

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    Now the judge who Trump has been royally pissing off the whole time gets to sentence him. If your justice boner lasts for more than 4 hours, please consult a doctor.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hey now, on this occasion there’s enough Riker to go around for all of us.

      • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You can never have too much Riker….(the 14 year old girl who was me, waiting impatiently for TNG to come on…for the sci-fi…and the Riker).

        I met Jonathan Frakes at a con once and told him I had the biggest crush on him when I was a teenager. He said, “Well what changed?”

        Riker gonna Riker lol

  • djsoren19@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Today is a very good day.

    Now on the downside, convicted felons are still legally allowed to run for office. Not being able to vote for himself is delicious schadenfreude, but this doesn’t suddenly save democracy. However, I would expect Biden’s administration will push this hard, and I don’t think undecided voters want a felon in the White House.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are several countries that won’t approve your visa if you are convicted felon.

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      IANAL, but If I’m understanding this correctly, because he was found guilty of class E felonies, there is technically a minimum of 1 year in prison, but if the court:

      is of the opinion that a sentence of imprisonment is necessary but that it would be unduly harsh to impose an indeterminate or determinate sentence, the court may impose a definite sentence of imprisonment and fix a term of one year or less.

      Which seems like an alternative minimum. It seems like there will be additional evaluations as part of sentencing, which may or may not be postponed by appeals. He may get up to 4 years per count (which I’m assuming would be concurrent), maybe 1, maybe less if the court finds that it would be harsh to do so.