Obviously I can understand why mysoginists are hated upon, As their belief is all women are trash or men are superior etc. But why are incels also generally hated upon? They are lacking in a way that makes them unable to gey in a relationship, but that shouldn’t necessarily mean they are mysoginists, right?

What am I missing here? I haven’t ever had a relationship with a woman, but I don’t hate all women either. I just consider myself unlucky. Does that make me an incel?

  • 20inmyhead@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve never encountered an incel that wasn’t misogynistic. Generally they blame women for their lack of sex.

  • Hovenko@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Incel is a shit person who is unable to have romantic relationships with women and blames/hates them for that. They also tend to hate men who are successful in that regard. They are simply toxic squiggly emo worms.

  • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Does that make me an incel?

    Nope, it’s become a self identification ascribed to. Only defining feature of an imcel now is saying “I’m an incel”

    And it happens to be that said communities are jam packed full of some extreme bigotry, hate, loathing, misogynistic behavior, etc etc.

    Which means a person who identifies themselves with that crowd, can be assumed to be of the same cut of cloth.

    In other words, a person like you would likely say “I haven’t been with a woman but I ain’t no incel though”, to signal you don’t identify with that culture.

  • Skyketcher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    People naturally don’t want to think they are the problem. So, they blame society which leads to blaming women which leads to misogyny which leads to the dark side.

    People who label themselves as incels are somewhat accepting that the factors that lead them to be incels are unchangeable ( physical characteristics, limiting standards, social deficiencies, bad luck). So they have taken the steps to the dark side. And vocal incels are more often well on that path.

  • towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Im pretty sure an incel blames women for not being able to get a relationship.
    Its the change in mental framing from “maybe i should work on myself” or “i just havent had the right opportunity” to more of a “women hold too much power over me and are playing with me” or “ive done everything right, women owe me this”

    Wikipedia sums it up better than i can:

    Description of incels

    The subculture is often characterized by deep resentment, hatred, hostility, sexual objectification, misogyny, misanthropy, self-pity and self-loathing, racism, a sense of entitlement to sex, blaming of women and the sexually successful for their situation (which is often seen as predetermined due to biological determinism, evolutionary genetics or a rigged game), a sense of futility and nihilism, rape culture, and the endorsement of sexual and nonsexual violence against women and sexually active people.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incel

    So, unless you find yourself blaming/resenting women, then you arent an incel. Your still just figuring things out like tge rest of us!

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I am in a similar situation as you, I am 36 and have never been in a relationship, I don’t blame anyone, I am a bit sad about it when I think of it, but I can’t blame anyone for it, it is just circumstances.

    I think that “incels” are defined by their feeling that they deserve a relationship with a woman, that they are being denied what they believe is rightfully theirs and that by just being polite they can convince a woman to fall into their arms.

    I don’t concider myself an incel, for me based on circumstances if anything I have choosen to not persue a relationship, there are reasons for this, late maturity, being overweight, balding, concern for if I would find a woman who would be fine with me having zero experience in both day to day things as well as intimite moments.

    But these are all problems that I have to work on, and I do my best with the tools I have.

    • Nisaea@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Fwiw, about the zéro expérience thing, I hope you know that plenty of women would enjoy helping their partner explore how to share pleasure and day to day intimacy with them. Being inexperienced and realistic about it also means you won’t have that overconfidence that leads some men to disregard their partner’s personal likes, needs and body quirks, and that can be a very reassuring premise.

      Source : this old crone was that woman once.

  • Crampon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t believe anyone cares for Incels as people just in involuntary celibat letting their day go by with studies, work and their hobby.

    Incels who are loud misogynistic is the only people we know are actually in involuntary celibat, and mad about it.

    Grown ups don’t hate virgins by default.

  • retrieval4558@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Lots of good posts here so far. Something I haven’t seen mentioned is incel fascination with what is essentially phrenology. “My jaw is only 34% as prominent as the ideal and therefore I will never know the touch of a woman”.

  • xia@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    My perception is that sex-starved males are seen as dangerous, and the fear of that easily translates into a stigma.

    I recall my recently-divorced friend (with a young daughter) trying to describe this to me: how almost overnight the girly sleepovers and socials went from common & spread across the homes to “silently forbidden” and unspokenly “anywhere but his house”. But he was the same guy as just days before, but (so the theory goes) the only change was that now people “knew” he was not being… pacified?

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      One thing about being a woman (which I am not for the record, I have a lovely wife who explains things) is that you can’t just trust men. They can overpower you, and even though most won’t, some will and there’s no way to tell who it’s going to be. That necessarily means women have to not trust men that they don’t know intimately for their own safety.

      That concept certainly extends to parents of girls. If there is not a female authority in the house, a sleepover with a man and bunch of girls is questionable at best and tragedy waiting to happen at worst, even if that man is one of their fathers.

      It doesn’t mean that they have to think that man is “unpacified” to call out that specific situation as inappropriate. It’s just a boundary your friend now has to be aware of, and agree to let his daughter go to sleepovers in other girls’ homes.

      That being said, I wouldn’t call this specific situation stigma from being a perceived incel, but more like parents being wary of a single man they might not know that well hosting a sleepover with a bunch of girls.

      Edit: There have already been a couple of real salty men who take issue with the fact that women are wary of men just because they’re men. I get it. I’ve been there.

      But I’m not going to rehash the whole argument I just went through because you might think the line of reasoning that you aren’t a rapist means it’s wrong for women to take precautions.

      It’s not personal. It’s not a reflection of you as a person. It’s just something women have to be aware of.

      I’m not going to engage this point with anyone else. I posted some resources. I’d urge anyone who comes away from this comment thread with anger or confusion to just get a woman’s perspective first and try to be open minded.

      • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        What the hell?

        That’s an awful take on life. Replace “men” who can overpower women with a race of people who have larger physiques than the average people or perhaps with those who hail from culture who has had a more violent past. We’re obviously just assuming things, so why not? A generic man can overpower a generic woman just as much as a generic Norwegian person can overpower a generic Korean person.

        That’s saying that you can’t trust your kids to sleep over at the house of anybody who isn’t like you. I really hope that you guys aren’t pushing this world view on children.

        • ChexMax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Is it an awful way to go through life? Yes. Does it lower your risk to go through life this way? Also yes. Sorry, but I’m not risking my kid’s innocence to be politically correct.

          Not all men, but enough men to be wary of all men.

          • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            I can’t believe what I’m reading in this thread.

            You are judging half of the population on their physical makeup.

            This makes me sick.

            Fuck trying to be better than those who have come before us. Fuck trying to build a better future.

            I hope our paths never cross.

            • beardown@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              I agree with you. This sort of blatant bigotry has to be a right wing psyop to split the left or something. No way that “liberal” minded people could think it’s rational to discriminate against half the population

              • june@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Lmao

                You’re really missing the point here and getting offended over reality for half the population.

                Enough men are a danger to women and children that it forces women to be wary of all men. Which is the smart and right thing to do.

                If you’re in a room with 100 people and you know 10 of them are extremely violent with extremely short fuses that can be triggered by anything from a casual look to an uninvited ‘hello’’, but you don’t know which 10 it is, how are you going to socially navigate that room? Are you going to pretend like everyone in that room is a friend and make strong eye contact with everyone saying hello? Or are you going to tread lightly?

                That’s the reality women face with men every day.

                • beardown@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I know plenty of people who make this same argument for why whites can’t trust blacks. Those people are called racists. People who make the argument you’re making are called sexists.

  • MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ah, I miss the good old days of r/incelwithouthate. The perfect site for a subhuman like me without the possible terrorism.