• GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    1 month ago

    On the one hand, I’m not even running 4K yet, and it is vanishingly unlikely that I will own a >4K display within the lifetime of my PS5, so this makes no difference to me.

    On the other hand, I would like to see blatant false advertising punished every time it happens. “Nobody really cares” isn’t much of an excuse when they clearly thought people cared enough to put it prominently on the box. Being able to play high-end video 10 years down the line is a legitimate selling point for a gaming console that doubles as media box.

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      On the third hand a TV at couch distance is going to look only slightly better at 4k vs 1080p. 8k is just a waste of electricity

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        30 days ago

        That’s EXACTLY what people said about 720p to 1080p.

        Source: sales bitch when 1080p came out. Blatantly false.

        1080p to 4k is a fucking huge different no matter what device, size, or distance. I’m not trying to be combative—I run all my stuff at 1440p144hz.

        1080p to 4k at couch distance is HUGE though. If I could easily run 4k144hz I would, but that’s not in my budget right now.

        8k is even more insane but you’re right—you need a BEAST of a computer to be able to display that.

        • Vilian@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          the 720p to 1080p is a complete lie, not the 4k to 8k, because that is supported by math

          or maybe the couch distance was different back them, and the TVs were smaller there’s that

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        of course it depends on the distance vs size vs resolution thing.

        of course 4k is gonna look much better vs fhd in a computer monitor you sit 40 centimeters from for example, but on a medium sized tv sitting 5-10 meters away?

  • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah I don’t see 8K delivering any value. My eyes can’t resolve past 4k anyway, it’ll just be heavier on the GPU and it won’t get me a damn thing.

    Sure, 64k ought to be enough, yada yada. That doesn’t apply when you’re running up against biological limits though.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think even 4K can be overkill depending on the size of your monitor. I feel like the size of a monitor that wants 8K for good enough PPI would be impractically huge, at least for desktop use.

    • optissima@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Okay but you can now have a larger screen with the same DPI and distance, giving you a wider fov.

  • Sony has quietly removed the 8k logo…a change that appears to have happened between late January and mid-February

    I must have gotten mine just before then. I still have the box and had to check; 8K branding. I got it somewhere between January and February, right around the time the thing started being regularly in stock again.