• kinther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Do you know how a first past the post electoral system works? Or are you young and naive, thinking that politics isn’t about compromise?

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Seems like compromise is “the political party does whatever they want and you guarantee your undying loyalty to them with your vote”. You speak of youth and naivety, but only an idiot would accept such a “deal”. If our votes have power then we should wield it.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The fact that you think voting is an undying loyalty and not a simple strategic decision baffles me, and embodies the exact argument I keep seeing on here. You know how you wield the power of your vote? USE IT. Voting 3rd party is really dumb right now but in theory okay. Not voting simply means you don’t care.

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Politics is absolutely about compromise, but Democrats never really compromise with progressives. The most we get is putting weed in the hands of the pharmaceutical companies, Yippee.

      • kinther@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        So you’re saying that… I should abide by principles… by allowing my country to further descend into fascism… by not voting for a politician that could prevent that…

        …right. You’re a smart mother fucker.

        • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          4 months ago

          Don’t be mad at me because I forced you to confront your own lack of principles. I’ve got a principle, personally, that won’t allow me to vote for a genocidaire. I don’t think that’s a very high fucking bar. If we have found ourselves at an election where our choices are between two fascists, then we are already in fascism. If there is no way to vote for “no genocide” then there is no serious reason to vote.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’ve got a principle, personally, that won’t allow me to vote for a genocidaire. I don’t think that’s a very high fucking bar.

            Pretty clearly it’s not a very high bar, since you’re supporting an intensification of that genocide and the commencement of several others. That’s a bar too low to limbo under.

            • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yeah man, I’m sorry but if you’re doing a genocide, fuck you. I’ve got nothing but hate for you. I don’t care who you are, or who might also do the same thing. I’ll hate them too. That’s what a principle is. If more people had such a principle maybe we could make real political changes instead of giving “political capital” to war criminals.

              • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Yeah man, I’m sorry but if you’re doing a genocide, fuck you. I’ve got nothing but hate for you.

                It’s a shame you hate yourself so much. Wait, if you’re pursuing multiple genocides, as you are by furiously seeking a Trump victory, is your hate multiplied?

          • magnetosphere@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Okay, you’ve hit on exactly what I don’t get.

            Most Federal elections aren’t about good vs. bad. They’re about choosing the lesser of two evils. That’s important to remember.

            As I see it, a vote for Biden OR Trump is a vote supporting genocide. On that one issue, sadly, there’s no real choice.

            However, voting for Trump also brings with it sexism, racism and an inevitable threat to democracy - in addition to genocide. Crucially, changing the system for the better would become MUCH harder under Trump. Choosing not to vote at all (or voting for a 3rd party candidate with no real chance of winning) helps Trump. It would be giving up on yourself, and society as a whole. It would be saying that things are too broken to be fixed, ever, so it’s okay to let future generations suffer.

            I don’t see the moral benefit in failing to choose the lesser of two evils.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              When full support for genocide is “the lesser of two evils” then you’ve already lost. It’s straight up evil.

            • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              4 months ago

              A system that only allows you to choose between two enthusiastic war criminals should be given up on. There is no saving or reforming such a system. An election boycott and riots in the street are a preferable choice as far as I’m concerned.

                • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I’m not doing shit about electoral reform. I would like to understand exactly the kind of optimism it takes to believe that meaningful electoral reform is a real possibility. Give me your realistic roadmap to a materially better system, accomplished through reforming the current one. I don’t expect a detailed plan, but what are the broad strokes?

                  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    So you refuse to engage in the system and refuse to try to replace it? What the fuck are you doing here complaining? You have no right to complain, you’re literally doing nothing and watching the ship sink around you and shouting “hey! This sucks! I sure wish it was different!” How about you help fix it? Literally what are you doing like why would you do this you’re wasting everyone’s time

      • theonyltruemupf@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        So you base your voting decision on an abstracted philosophical argument? Maybe take a good look at the US voting system and ask yourself what happens when Trump wins because people like you upheld their “principles”.

        • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t understand why it is so hard to grasp that opposition to an ongoing genocide is not “an abstracted philosophical argument”. Wake the fuck up. It’s real, and it’s happening right now. The guy you insist I vote for is angry at the idea that anyone (not even himself) be held criminally responsible!

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’a abstract because you aren’t considering the consequences of your vote. Here are your choices:

            • Genocide, unions, anti-monopoly actions, infrastructure, healthcare, loan forgiveness, an excellent cabinet, and some other things that I would consider generally good

            • Genocide, insurrection, corruption, hypocrisy, and literally so many negative things to list that I’m not capable of enumerating even a fraction of the total list

            • Either of the above is fine, pick whichever

            Those are your ONLY three options. It does not matter why you choose one. It does not matter what you believe, what principles you hold, or what you personally would do as president. The future that we find ourselves in comes down to this choice and this choice only. I cannot understand how a good person who understands this would make the wrong choice, so my goal is to make it as easy to understand this as possible.

            • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Your argument is the abstract one. You are laying out what I think are mostly bullshit choices, based on hypotheticals and assumptions (abstract). I am talking about what is happening right now (not abstract).

              I am definitely not going to get drawn into the finer points of what Biden has or hasn’t done or even more lamely, what he might or mightn’t do, but I will say this: I do not give one fuck about anything in your list compared to genocide. Like are you for real? Genocide but at least some loan forgiveness? Gross.