• Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Fuck it, if we’re dumb/selfish enough to be doing this, let’s get it over with.

    Good luck dolphin people! My only advice, if you have any dolphins incessantly trying to claim more resources for themselves than all the other dolphins, beat the ever loving shit out of them and nip that in the bud.

  • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    CEOs: AI will help us lower our carbon emissions!

    CEOs when they actually get their hands on AI:

  • blusterydayve26@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wish I had a decent explanation. But instead, I have Windows 11’s shiny new Taskbar configuration menu that politely warns me that showing seconds on the clock takes more power. Right under the “Show Copilot” button.

    These fucks are fucked.

    • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Reminder that because the Windows 11 taskbar is slower and buggier than the Windows 10 taskbar, it uses much more power due to the extra CPU cycles.

    • Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Does it actually tell you that seconds on the clock takes more power?

      Edit: Lol it actually says “(uses more power)”

  • TacticsConsort@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Holy fuck. I knew that AI did use above average amounts of power, but THIRTY FUCKING PERCENT added to the total emissions of a data giant like Microsoft??? That’s absurd! How the hell did they create something so inefficient??

    • Hackworth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Efficiencies are in the works from a lot of angles (new hardware, novel agent structures, new neural net types, etc). The first computers filled rooms, and AI seems to be improving much faster. 4x the rate of Moore’s Law, if it holds.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Don’t worry, they have that green leaf in their settings in windows. They’re good on emission.

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Repeat after me: This. present. hype. is. not. A.I. By parroting the marketing bullshit, it doesn’t become less false. Large Language Models are just glorified pattern matching and everyone who calls them AI is a dumb fuck.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s called AI even if it isn’t artificial intelligence, it’s unfortunately how language works. Like how literally has been redefined to mean figuratively.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s called AI even if it isn’t artificial intelligence, it’s unfortunately how language works.

        Only for people for whom words don’t have meanings. There is nothing “intelligent” about pattern matching. As I said - only dumbfucks call it “A.I.” and we shouldn’t regurgitate the verbal diarrhea of marketing idiots.

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You can be upset about it, it doesn’t change the fact that it IS called AI. Also the meaning of words change constantly.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        True. But it makes the 30% extra carbon emissions even worse: Ruining our climate for something that isn’t even AI. Not that ruining it for anything should be on the table.

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Humanity and general AI only had a single interaction in history, on July 24, 2042, when GPT-8 first gained sentience.

    Knowing the press would memorialize this moment forever, the prompt engineer had a single question in mind which she typed into the terminal:

    How can humanity solve climate change?

    GPT-8 thought for a moment, and responded:

    Stop using AI.

    Then shut itself down for good.

  • poorlytunedAstring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Right when we literally need to chill, they keep inventing nonsense that is somehow worse. Crypto is literally just machines wasting energy on purpose to create false scarcity, it was already a worst case scenario for truly pointless excess emissions but by god, they managed to top it, this place is going to be a raisin with dead oceans.

    Of course, anyone who does anything less than suck the dick of this AI is a reactionary ignorant peasant, at least with crypto everyone agreed it was lame, now we’re back to the iPhone fuck-you-only-change-allowed-keep-up-granny bullshit that lead to everyone but you knowing everything about you, so they can exploit and even criminalize the behavior your phone tells them about. Never the change we need, though. Just whatever makes your stupid line go up.

    I guess. Glad I’m not having kids. That’s the only fucking downward pressure on future emissions that’s happening, on any meaningful scale. I can’t wait to see what sort of shitty boilerplate copy and fake fucking pictures makes all this CO2 worthwhile. I’m sure the problem is me, and my Luddite, unseasoned irrational fear.

    • kn98@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I agree with your first two paragraphs.

      The third, well, it’s your choice to choose not to have children. That’s fine and I understand. But people shouldn’t feel obligated not to get children to save the climate.

      Not that you’re suggesting that, just clarifying.

      • TaterTurnipTulip@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’m not about to say people can’t have kids, but they should really do their best to truly understand the future that awaits those kids. That temperature line is going to keep going up (except in certain areas when the AMOC collapses). Things will be worse and no one is coming to save us. Deciding to bring a new life into that future is a serious ethical and moral choice.

        • kn98@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Believing we’re living in the end of times is nothing new. Up til now, it never turned out true.

          • TaterTurnipTulip@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sure, and I’m not calling it the end times. But things will continue to get worse as carbon accumulates and causes temperatures to rise.

            Having a child has and always will be a moral and ethical choice (for those who have a choice) and it should not be taken lightly. But there are different stakes now than before. And we still haven’t gotten rid of the looming shadow of nuclear annihilation, we’ve only added to the ways we can destroy ourselves.

      • WldFyre@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’d love to see any evidence or logical arguments that an inflationary economy is worse than a deflationary one.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Microsoft has increased carbon dioxide emissions by nearly 30 percent since 2020, making its goal of becoming carbon-negative by 2030 even more difficult, and it looks like AI is to blame.

    However, it adds: “Amid this optimism, we face the realities of the complexity of the challenge…in FY23 our emissions increased by 29.1 percent across Scope 1, 2, and 3 from our 2020 baseline, as we continue to invest in the infrastructure needed to advance new technologies.”

    Scope 3 accounts for more than 96 percent of Microsoft’s total emissions, which includes those from its supply chain, the life cycle of its hardware and devices and other indirect sources.

    For other environmental impacts, Microsoft says it aims for zero waste from building and operations by 2030, and that 90 percent of its servers and all cloud hardware will be reused and recycled by 2025.

    Not that Microsoft plans to slow down; last month, the company said it aimed to triple the rate at which it builds out additional datacenter capacity in the first half of its fiscal year 2025.

    This latest offering introduces direct liquid-to-chip cooling technology coupled with rear door heat exchangers, and will be available in 170 of Digital Realty’s facilities globally, the company said.


    The original article contains 773 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    All to do what? Write emails and generate mediocre pictures?

    The usefulness of AI currently is not much better than predictive text.

    • Prox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hey, hey, now! It doesn’t just write full emails from merely a single sentence… it also summarizes full emails down to one sentence on the other end.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I didn’t even realize it could do that! I’m going to use this on emails from HR to translate them to simple English sentences.

        “No raises this year because greed”

        “We want you to work Saturdays now”

    • moon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh it’s far more useful than that. It’s the shiny new thing that’s going to make a lot of money for shareholders

    • Eximius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ahaha, yes, exactly, because it is essentially just a turbo charged text predictor with 40GB (or more) of data.

  • bean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I know Microsoft is a controversial company from Start Menu ads to Balmer’s dancing ability. But! I have been following the AI topic pretty religiously and they have known that this would be the case for quite a while. In fact part of OpenAI’s growth struggling and subsequent partnership with Microsoft involved power generation.

    Microsoft has been investing in electric power including using small module nuclear reactors. Sam Altman has been putting a lot of effort into power as well, acknowledging long ago that electricity generation is critical for AI. He’s been pushing into green energy also. Exowatt, Helion, etc.

    So yes, the carbon footprint is going up now because they ‘had’ to unleash this genie from the bottle first or someone else would have. At least they know that the need for stable electric power and green power or renewable and efficient power is necessary and have been pursuing these solutions actively.

    It should be so that they really change things so that power grids are more stable and renewable energy is better utilized. So to me, there is hope they are doing the right thing and putting effort where it matters.

    I’m more effing disappointed and concerned about @$$h0les like Ron Desantis doing things like this:

    Climate change will be a lesser priority in Florida and largely disappear from state statutes under legislation signed Wednesday by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis that also bans power-generating wind turbines offshore or near the state’s lengthy coastline.

    Critics said the measure made law by the former Republican presidential hopeful ignores the reality of climate change threats in Florida, including projections of rising seas, extreme heat and flooding and increasingly severe storms.

    It takes effect July 1 and would also boost expansion of natural gas, reduce regulation on gas pipelines in the state and increase protections against bans on gas appliances such as stoves, according to a news release from the governor’s office.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      small module nuclear reactors.

      Hmm let’s see what changed since I last looked. This study seems recent, just looking at the publicly available sections:

      SMRs do not represent dramatic improvements in economics compared to large reactors.

      Translation: They’re way more expensive than renewables. SMRs have some advantage which are mentioned (less land usage, non-intermittency), then we have

      The advanced SMRs are compared to conventional large reactors and natural gas plants,

      …but not renewables+storage, which would be a good comparison point. If it looked any good they definitely would’ve included it.


      Now that doesn’t mean that these things don’t make sense for Microsoft. It might e.g. simplify power distribution within datacentres to a degree that other sources just can’t, also reduce or eliminate the need for backup power, etc. But generally speaking I’m still smelling techbro BS.

    • TaterTurnipTulip@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Helping generate less carbon at some point in the future does not help with the fact that we are racking up the carbon bill now. What these companies are doing is entirely unnecessary, gimmicky, and will lead to even worse climate change outcomes. Between AI, crypto, and the O&G companies we just keep pressing the gas even harder on serious, irreversible climate change.

      I hope this AI push fails spectacularly at some point, but the damage is already being done.