• magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    4 months ago

    As much as I love science, and I’d much rather see billions spent on a collider than war, I gotta admit this is funny as hell.

  • ID411@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Ok, but what does this collider do, that the one you have in the garage won’t do ?”

    Mrs Cern.

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    What would happen if we put a small collider inside of a bigger collider and spun it around while it spun around?

    • zout@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Yo dawg, I heard you like colliders, so we built a collider into your collider so it can collide while it collides…”

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      There will be.

      Colliders work best at specific speeds, like gears on a car. The big collider is fed by a smaller one. That one is likely fed by an even smaller one. Eventually, you get small enough that a simple linear accelerator can get the gas up to speed.

      Oh, and likely a scientist/engineer grinning manically as they “push the trigger” on the largest rail gun in existence.

    • x4740N@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Now that you’ve said this I want to know if other shapes without corners are possible

      But also why do they need a bigger collider

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh ew, really? I’m not overly surprised to be honest, her video on trans people was awful.

        • b000rg@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Absolutely horrendous. I stopped watching her after that. I don’t care if it was good intentioned or not, she obviously should have expanded her understanding of the topic before presenting herself as an expert on it, and that makes me wonder how many other topics she covers in this way.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            I didn’t see that one on her view of trans people, but her recent one on nuclear power was nearly biased and selective enough to be called “disinformation”.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That means you missed her video on how capitalism is good actually. It’s about as horrid as you’d expect.

    • A7thStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its labourers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people.

      -Dwight D. Eisenhower

      • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, if history has taught as nothing else, it’s that the guy with the biggest stick usually wins. There are many criticisms of the U.S. military, but no one could accuse it of being weak. That kind of deterrence is invaluable.

    • troglodytis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yep, that was when the US jumped the shark. It was the exact moment, Oct 20, 1993, we went “fuck science, we’re only doing short term profits now.”

  • daniyeg@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    for context 22 billion is a few billions less than what elon musk overpaid for twitter. i don’t think a bigger collider will do anything but I’d like for humanity to have this rather than whatever the fuck the rich are doing now.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      22 billion is half of what Elon paid for Twitter. He paid 44 billion.

      So this seems like a pretty good bargain for unlocking the secrets of the universe.

      • daniyeg@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        if i remember correctly twitter was evaluated as 20 billion before musk bought it, so he overpaid by 24 billion dollars which is a couple billion dollars more than the price tag quoted here.

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah… And at least this will generate jobs… And not reduce them like it did on Xitter.

      • Zarcher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Cern has produced quite some interesting systems for software and data management. I am sure the added value of the work is beyond just understanding particles.

  • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is starting to turn into some Full Metal Alchemist shit. If you know, you know.

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Is not only about physics research. The complexity of those projects fund hundreds of sectors and push forward new technologies who will have many commercial use.

    …Also they’ve confirmed the existence of this little thing called Higgs Boson which field define pretty much reality, soo… not exactly wasted time.

      • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        There are plenty of natural particles colliders, such as black holes or very dense stars, that are way more powerful than our engineered particle colliders, which (observationally) don’t create black holes around them

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They posit that yes, black holes could be formed, but they’re so small they evaporate pretty much instantly. They don’t have the mass to survive.

    • GlenRambo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Awesome. And with reality defined my daily existance and cost of living is. … Exactly the same and killing me. 🙃