• vexikron@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Grant Cardone is a Scientologist who more or less runs a variety of real estate scams to enrich himself and other prominent Scientologists.

    That being said, I would not be surprised if we end up with 50 year mortgages, but 100 seems absolutely insane to me as just… most people do not live that long.

    Renting clothes? Honestly, this wouldnt surprise me either.

    Its kind of a perfect scam actually: Set up the terms and conditions such that if there is any damage to the clothes, you have to pay for their repair or replacement, and then also offer clothing rental insurance for an extra fee, just in case!

    Pay a bunch of instagram and tiktok influencers to rep various fashions and the clothing rental company, and of course manufacture all the clothes in sweatshops in the global south and charge something like 10 to 1000 times the variable cost of making any particular clothing item to the global north, but then rent the article of clothing for what 1/3 of the that number, per week.

    Works much better if you can make certain clothing items /only/ rentable and not outright purchasable via basically coordinating with existing brands, exclusivity works to get gamers to shell out stupid amounts of money for basically unique cosmetics, why wouldnt it work here?

    People bought gamer girl bath water, Republicans have destroyed public education, scrolling insta or tik tok all the time is basically known to cause various mental disorders but people so it because its addictive like a drug…

    … yes i absolutely believe American Gen Zers would fall for this, and probably a good number of Millenials too

    Hooray Capitalism!

    Anyway, I think Cardone is saying stuff like this to try to posture as a concerned citizen, meanwhile, if I am not mistaken, I am fairly sure he is facing legal trouble relating to basically running a real estate flavored ponzi scheme. So I mean he is a real estate guy rofl, and I think his general concern is valid… its nearly certainly just him doing his own PR.

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I feel like the purported capitalism that’s run rampant for centuries is just an extension and rebranding of the OG feudalism. Always thought that.

      • alekwithak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Very true, been touting this for years. The rich tricked the peasantry into helping them take over the aristocracy. Now we have less legal protections than a medieval serf.

      • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Basically. The original bourgeois fighting against the feudal lords basically changed just enough so that they themselves could become lords, or lord like, with no so much care for anyone below thier own class.

      • Cowbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        There are significant differences, but yes, in a way. Class conflict has always been at the core of modern human history, and when the bourgeoisie and Proletariat teamed up against the Aristocracy, Capital was transfered from the hands of the microscopically few to the hands of much more. However, this is an incomplete transfer of power, and as Capital consolidates, it trends back to a form of Feudalism.

        • blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah, well put. I’m just identifying the underlying class conflict of resource scarcity and power hunger, through all of human history under the guise of any and every governmental system

          Very concisely written dude… really nails the way the shifting about happened

        • blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I had a history teacher in the late 90s that lapped up every paper I wrote bc within the boundaries of the assignment, I’d be writing about Che instead of Teddy Roosevelt.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Or…perhaps…instead of 100-year mortgages we learn from the French and start separating heads and wealth from the 1% that are trying to own everything so they can rent it to us.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m going to sit down with Mom and get a refresher course on sewing. I can make simple stuff.

    I have made clothing patterns in Autocad and printed them out on a plotter before. Going to pirate some pants.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Everyone loves a planned economy pretending to be a free market. It just happens that the plan of the US economy is to give alllll the money and assets to a small selection of political sugar daddies.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Just popping in to remind everyone that ‘free market’ as commonly defined is a misnomer.

      The market tilts toward imbalance always, and the notion that it regulates itself is a myth. The consolidation we see today and rave against as a ‘planned economy’ is not an aberration of the free market, it is exactly the thing it was expected to do.

    • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      no matter as long as I have my place in heaven and all my sins are forgiven… who needs money, health or even happiness? God bless america, gimme guns, freeeeedom! /s

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    In Montreal, Québec, 0.045% of the population own over 30% of residential properties.

    Edit: actually that’s 0.46% of property owners own 32% of rental properties in Montréal.

    Source (French)

    • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes, they do. They will then increase the punishment saying it’s to discourage more (proven not to work) so they can arrest people for long periods and have their legal slave labor.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 months ago

      Used to be, you about had to rent. Now it’s cheaper to own both items.

      Just got married last month. Bought my wife’s dress for ~$160 and my (second!) tux set for $110. And we looked fly as fuck.

      Buying clothes ain’t the thing. Capitalism worked great on some fronts! Buying a home is the thing. And capitalism failed hard on others.

      Young people got straight fucked on that, and you should be rioting in the streets.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        You look like an Irish mob boss who runs a 24/7 soup kitchen and sends his enforcers to guard union strikes. I mean this in the best way.

      • artisanrox@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        😍 congratulations! yeah, you look great.

        you should be rioting in the streets.

        The Texas Cox decision pretty much seals we’re too fffn asleep to be in the streets about anything now.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The thing is, if everyone rents homes, then there will be a ton of political pressure to fix pricing. Of course the system is so broken that there’s no guarantee of real change, but it could happen.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re assuming people won’t vote directly against their interests. This is America lol

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s why I hedged a lot, because people do all sorts of things, and the status is not quo.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      A majority of people should always be renters, and homes should lose value over time if not rehabbed. Until both of those boxes are checked, housing prices will continue to rise.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Why should a majority of people be renters?

        Prices are high because of hoarding by land barons and corps while we simply don’t build enough in my opinion.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          If not renters, condo (or something like it) owners. We need to build for density and disincentivize house ownership, because demand exceeds supply by such margins that we are unlikely to resolve it any time in the next generation of we only build houses - plus we are contributing to sprawl and the associated externalities.

          LA is a warning, not an ideal.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    What a load of crap. “if these data points I cherry picked hold to this trend in a straight line forever” blah, blah, blah. By the way, buy my book

  • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Because our money is worthless and all the wealth is in the hands of people we’ll never even see bc they live in the modern equivalent of castles? But hey at least we can finance cheap useless mass produced shit from overseas and feel so bougie

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    they United States Federal government holds the note on my house. I’m paying 1% interest. for 33 years.

    it’s a pretty sweet deal.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I got a Habitat for Humanity house and mortgage. 0% interest, 0 property taxes. Cost of the home was the cost of purchasing the land and building it.

      Keep playing sucker games kids, keep getting suckered, keep bitching.

      Or maybe try something?