He’s a father of a 28-year-old son and he’s hurting. A retired police officer, he proudly voted for Donald Trump every time he ran and never hid his political beliefs from his family. “My son and his wife say that since I’m a fan of Trump they’re no fan of mine and cut me off,” he said. “Now I can’t see my only grandchild who I was so close to. It’s crazy and it’s tragic.”

It’s also increasingly common. The 2024 election spatchcocked the nation, widening a rift that was exposed in 2016 and put in an even sharper gulf four years later. Now, the hyper-partisan politics in the shadow of the 2024 election is breaking the bonds of families to a greater extent than ever before.

  • Breve@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nobody really gets disowned for voting for a particular candidate because voting is private and done in secret. You can lie about who you voted for and nobody can even prove it.

    People actually get disowned for constantly talking about voting for a particular candidate, even after their friends and family ask them to stop.

    They made their choice to put their politics before their family and need to cry publicly about it to get that sweet persecution complex.

  • theparadox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Social psychologists have long understood that merely identifying with a group in competitive contexts can lead people to view those outside the group less favorably.

    Ah yes. It’s because they are on the other team that proud Trump supporters are being ostracized. The fact Trump and his allies have blatantly advertised goals that are dangerous, damaging, bigoted, hateful, and generally horrific… and their poorly hidden goals are even more so… has nothing to do with it. It’s just competition bringing out the worst in the rest of us.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, ingroup and outgroup biases are well demonstrated phenomena.

      But uh. Sometimes things aren’t JUST biases. Sometimes the other team is, well and truly, bad and worthy of our scorn.

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Gullibility and ignorant malice are an epidemic. Hate and stupidity are an epidemic. Estrangement is self-preservation and a symptom. We aren’t boomers, we don’t stay in abusive relationships because “that be how the world be”.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 days ago

    Maybe its just that I was disowned in 2015 for being trans, but I find it hard to be sympathetic. We choose who we vote for and if your loved ones say your political views are so reprehensible that they won’t speak to you, either take the cue or accept that you shit the bed and now you have to lie in it

  • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    3 days ago

    Two-thirds of survey respondents agree that ending contact with a family member because of political beliefs is not justified and that most family fights over politics could be easily resolved.

    Ah yes those pesky, abstract “political” beliefs shouldn’t get in the way of family. Such esoteric ideals like

    • I believe in human rights.
    • Rapists should not be in power.
    • Nazis are evil.

    Who could ever let a silly disagreement over politics spoil a relationship? /s

    • yuri@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s hard to be told “everything will be fine” when much of the incoming administration believes trans people aren’t real/shouldn’t exist/are all groomers. And it’s really difficult to even associate with folks who voted for this and refuse to see the coming storm.

      Fucken, not to compare everything to nazis but it is LITERALLY the “first they came for x, but i am not x so i said nothing”, only it’s the fucking PARENTS hearing THEIR KIDS say “I don’t feel safe” and saying nothing except “can you believe my crazy children?”

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t understand Dem supporters cutting off family that are GOP supporters. Both parties oppose human rights, enable rapists in power, and support currently arming Nazis (Congress had to withdraw a ban on arming Nazis in order to send arms to far-right groups in Ukraine).

      If you’re a leftist opposing both fascist rightwing parties, you’d have a leg to stand on. But Dem supporters cutting off GOP supporting family just feels like that meme of spiderman pointing at himself. Anyone supporting either pro-genocide party is in no position to be criticizing the political beliefs of others.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Assuming this is a good faith argument, I’ll throw in: Some thoughtful, leftist commentary claims that the Democrats and the Republicans are fundamentally the same behind the scenes, with identity politics as the window dressing to distinguish them, and keep the lower classes divided.

        Well, look at what we have here: Identity politics successfully dividing the lower classes. The two parties do differ quite a bit in some ways, and the window dressing is causing the estrangement.

          • btaf45@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            How do they differ in any way besides rhetoric?

            In the most important way of all by far. Republicans always do gigantic tax cuts for the rich and corporations. Dems always raise taxes on the rich and/or corporations. All 3 of the most recent Dem presidents accomplished the latter.

            Why are taxation rates the most important thing to pay attention to? Because wealth inequality is related to and driving almost all of our other problems. If someone payed attention only to tax rates on the wealthy being cut/increased then they would understand 95% of politics.

            • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah, but I don’t care about their rhetoric. I care about how they govern, and in that respect there’s no difference between the GOP and the Dems.

              • btaf45@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                nd in that respect there’s no difference between the GOP and the Dems.

                You mean besides the $4.5 trillion in taxes on the wealthy and/or corporations? Musk fucked up twitter by burning just a mere $0.044 trillion.

              • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                Okay, but your first comment referenced supporters, who are different people than the electeds or party leaders. I might suggest re-phrasing to say, “I believe that Dem supporters have the same facts, thoughts, and perspective on the parties as I do, and as such, I find them morally culpable for every action of the party leaders.” That’s a different thing than not understanding how they can behave the way they do.

              • rhadamanth_nemes@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Trump is directly responsible for the poor and delayed response to COVID and furthering the validity of fringe anti mask claims, making him also directly responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.

                • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Yup. And Biden is responsible for hundreds of thousands more, ending Covid assistance, forcing people back to the office, and implementing Trump’s shitty “stop counting sick people” idea to pretend it was over. There’s still people dying today of severe covid, with it as one of the top killers of young people now.

                  Prosecute them both for these deaths.

      • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Unfortunately it’s a side effect of the team sports of politics. I vote Dem but they obviously have problems to fix. My family mainly votes RNC. I can talk to some on an individual level and get to agreements about political topics. Usually after agreeing on something they will reset back to talking points.

        I understand why some people will cut off toxic families, but it doesn’t help change the situation. I feel obligated to try to talk sense into people while I still have some patience. Pushing each group further into their echo chamber just helps our oppressors.

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Arming Nazis & ISIS, supporting genocide, escalating to hot wars with nuclear superpowers, breaking records on oil extractions, breaking records on deportations, working to privatize Medicare, etc. Saying the Dems have “some problems to fix” is putting it mildly. If you judge their actions, instead of their words, there’s no difference between the two.

          You’re in no position to be giving your family any grief while you’re still voting for Dems. Pot calling the kettle black.

          • btaf45@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            If you judge their actions, instead of their words, there’s no difference between the two.

            Dems did literally none of those things. Your conclusions are worthless because your facts are too.

          • punchmesan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            In the US there are only two party choices that matter. We are forced to vote for evil and must choose the lesser. I agree with you in principal but Trump is an especially egregious choice.

            • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              When both evils support genocide, there is no lesser. The only reason these two maintain their power is because people like you convince everyone that’s all that’s possible.

              • btaf45@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                The only reason these two maintain their power is because people like you convince everyone that’s all that’s possible.

                Is because those are the two with the support of the vast majority of voters and we don’t have a parliamentary system that would allow for more than 2 viable parties. By not voting for a serious candidate, all you are doing is setting yourself up to be a lifetime loser in politics.

              • punchmesan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Not to be reductionist of the genocide in Gaza, it is undoubtedly evil and both parties deserve to be labeled as such for supporting it, but to speak as though that’s the only issue in this world and the only yardstick we can use to measure both parties is itself reductionist. And the reason they maintain their power is that the system is so structured as to ensure it. And that’s not to say there is nothing we can do about that (for one, elimination of FPTP voting), but as of the 2024 election the reality was that only one of those two parties would win. And to claim that recognizing that in itself is the sole cause of it is silly.

                • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It’s not the only thing happening. But it is the worst thing happening. It’s the worst thing that can happen.

                  I thought we all agreed genocide is the worst crime possible.

          • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes. Thank for agreeing with me that the Dems have some problems to fix. I think their main problem is they put corporate interest over citizens. I think that will solve many of the other issues that you mentioned. Would you like to suggest something else for them to focus on? Or is your complaint that they aren’t perfect?

            I don’t got time for doomers that just want to blame others. We (humans) have enough blame to spread around. Fix each other and help each other grow. Don’t wall off everyone else.

            Also thank you AGAIN for agreeing with me (even if your reason isn’t 100). I’m NOT giving them grief. I am engaging them with conversations. I can do this because I don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. That just helps fascists.

            I guess my confusion is what do you think should happen? Then whatever you say as the answer. YOU go make that happen. You can keep complaining about other groups not doing anything, or you can get involved yourself. Join a different group, if the current ones aren’t up to your standards. Start a new group. Try to make the world a better place for you and your loved ones by trying to make your goals a reality.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hmm yes 2 and 4 are both numbers under 10, so they are the same number. I guess 4 is prime now.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 days ago

    This suggests we may need to put in extra effort to take responsibility for our role in conflicts, show greater empathy for others’ values and perspectives

    Hah! That’s pretty much exactly what I’ve said to my (right wing) relatives on a number of occasions but it doesn’t work. Does the author not realize that this perspective is very liberal?

    Liberals and progressives are the folks with empathy that can’t fathom how anyone could vote for Donald Trump; a well-known grifter, actual criminal, tax cheat, and total scumbag who cheated on all of his wives.

    I have a ton of empathy yet I still don’t understand conservatives. The only thing that makes sense to me is that they’re authoritarian and their chosen authority tells them to hate certain people, that any given thing is a conspiracy, and that no government-run program is ever a good thing. But to tell them that to their faces is like telling them that they’re stupid and suckers. To them it’s incredibly insulting.

    Yet when you try to figure out how they (someone who lives off Social Security) came to believe that, “Mexicans are stealing our jobs” it’s the only thing that makes sense. They really are suckers. They may have been “smart” at some point in their life but not anymore. They choose how to vote based on anger at imaginary enemies and fake news.

    • Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

      They want Order. Specifically, an Order where everyone is put on the Proper Rung of Society and Keeps to Their Place. And of course their Place is above X (insert minority group here) because they are Special because of Y (insert ridiculous circular reasoning—usually racist—here).

      These people literally believe that if Society becomes Unordered, it will collapse. And of course the only ones who can maintain that Order are the Great and Glorious White Men. The proof is that all the richest, most powerful people are White Men! (Any rich, powerful person who isn’t White and Male obviously got there through DEI action or cheating somehow.)

      Innuendo Studios has a pretty good video on this in his Alt-Right Playbook series.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, and my favorite example of metaphorically watching the same movie, but seeing a different story is the phrase, “law and order.” Plenty of us see the word Order and think of civil order, of happy communities of people going about their business without danger or conflict. The right and alt-right hear Order as social hierarchy. Black Lives Matter is a threat to Order just by existing, as Black people trying to move up to a higher rung on the social ladder than they belong on.

        Similarly, we hear Law as rules that everybody follows to ensure peaceful coexistence (order). They hear Law as in “the law,” as in the exercise of power by authorities, either to maintain the hierarchy (the old right) or just 'cuz it’s fun to hurt people (the alt-right).

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t try to equate liberals to understanding the empathy of progressives. Liberals are supporting a genocide as we speak. They’re rightwingers who believe themselves to be on the left. They are not.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Liberal and Left are literally synonyms. The distinctions you want would be left/far-left or liberal/radical.

        https://www.dictionary.com/e/leftright/

        [In politics, the word left is applied to people and groups that have liberal views.]

        supporting a genocide

        You use “genocide” so many times that you are causing me to yawn every time I read that. You don’t have the slightest clue on the actual things that would be required to fix Gaza. “Letting Trump win” is absolutely nowhere on that list.

  • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    3 days ago

    he proudly voted for Donald Trump every time he ran and never hid his political beliefs from his family.

    This sounds like an extremely euphemistic way to say he would not shut the fuck up about Donald Trump and his political beliefs. And his family likely gave him every chance in the world to quit that shit, and when they eventually just stopped wanting to be around him, he blamed everything but his own shitty behavior.

    I don’t know if that’s what happened in his case, but it certainly sounds like it.

  • ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh no! People are socialially ostracizing fascists.

    Anyways, I hope it doesn’t snow today.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Calling the bigotry and violence of fascist rhetoric “political beliefs” is lying by construction.

    If you want to be friends then why aren’t you friendly?

    They’re a bloodless thing, politics, abstract, almost administrative sometimes. Making decisions about who you associate with based on political views is apparently like getting into a screaming fight over an improper stapling methodology on one’s TPS reports, or ending a friendship over pizza toppings. And at other times, political views are sacrosanct, holy, the most special and personal part of a person’s belief structure, something that a decent person would be no more likely to critique, much less reject, than they would be likely to tell a new mother that her baby is ugly.

    I have noticed that whether political views are trivial or sacred seems to depend on the point the professional mourner of crumbling civility is trying to make in the moment, in order to bolster civility. They are usually trivial when we are meant to make friends despite them. They are usually sacrosanct when we try to point out what they are.

    But some of us have noticed that politics are neither of these things, have noticed that politics are where power is arranged and distributed, and have been listening not to the civility mourners or the supremacists they defend, but rather to the many people who are directly harmed by harmful policies driven by harmful political views, who have no luxury to believe in false separations. They know that politics are, in fact, a matter of spiritual alignment, and that spirit is not something to do with ghosts, but with the blood and guts of how collective belief touches their lives.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am recently estranged from a narc parent.

    Unfortunately in my case, it isn’t both of them. I have tried to explain to the other why I can’t roll with it, but it has been very difficult. Collateral damage, but I feel like I have no other option.

    Scruples are about the only thing a lot of us have anymore.

  • onoira [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s crazy and it’s tragic.

    take a drink every time a narc parent uses the words ‘weird’ or ‘crazy’ to describe being treated like the horrible person that they are.

  • cdf12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes, the grandfather is hurting and is clearly the victim. It cannot be due to his own choices and his children calling him out for being a shit person.

    ACAB

  • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Choosing bonds of identity over familial obligations” has judgemental connotations.

    The thing about “bonds of identity” is that those people respect your right to exist and your personal agency. The family that deserves to be cut off does not.

    If you’ve had it explained to you multiple times why the decisions you make are harming the people you claim to love, and you don’t change your behavior, don’t be surprised when that person you say you care about tells you to piss up a rope.

  • vikingr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Maybe he just shouldn’t be such a snowflake. As they say, facts don’t care about your feelings, and the fact is that every single Trump voter tacitly approves of what a repugnant human being he is.

    You are the company you keep.

    Too bad, so sad grandpa. Do better. Be better. BE BEST.

    I don’t really care, do you?