• Zess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Probably thinks it’s just a normal servant or slave, not a sexual one.

    • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      No, he knows exactly what it means. He’s stating they would his sexual slaves. Because they’re weak pussies, and he’s an alpha.

      Remember guys: it ain’t gay if you’re the one doing the fucking.

      • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        To my understanding, that’s the way ancient Romans viewed it. For lack of more delicate and concise words, it manly to top, unmanly to bottom. Gay sex was acceptable if the sexual roles reflected their social roles.