• Arkouda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can you explain to me how a 3rd party putting monitoring software on their own hardware is an over reach?

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      School is the counterparty and a state actor with everything that entails sign a poorly negotiated, likely corruption ridden contract with some trust me bro we don’t sell data, vendor, ie third party.

      Now your child is subject to a contract arrangement that you are not privy too that enables some “dudes” to track your child’s usage of equipment.

      If you don’t see this as an overeach, society has really degraded esp in context of the child abuse issues we are coming grips with.

      • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        School is the counterparty and a state actor with everything that entails sign a poorly negotiated, likely corruption ridden contract with some trust me bro we don’t sell data, vendor, ie third party.

        What could be gained by monitoring someones school activity that is not already bought and sold by social media companies that the majority use excessively and daily?

        Now your child is subject to a contract arrangement that you are not privy too that enables some “dudes” to track your child’s usage of equipment.

        Don’t use third party hardware if you are worried about being monitored.

        If you don’t see this as an overeach, society has really degraded esp in context of the child abuse issues we are coming grips with.

        If you could make a real argument that isn’t a personal attack or logical fallacy that would be great.