• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        16 days ago

        It depends. Defederation for good reasons is good, defederation for bad or false reasons is generally bad.

        As an example, having a strict and democratic defederation/federation policy has contributed to Hexbear having the most active trans community on Lemmy, and it’s a good thing that there’s an actively protected trans space free from bigotry.

        At the same time, defederating from instances for political reasons under the guise of other reasons is generally a bad thing.

        It’s largely context dependent.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          I mean, “bad” in this case is completely subjective. There are large trans communities on other instances (blahaj being the most obvious one) and they have their reasons for defederating from Hexbear.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            15 days ago

            Hexbear defederated from blahaj, not the other way around. Either way, Hexbear remains the most active trans community on Lemmy.

            I understand why anticommunist instances like Lemmy.world defederate from Hexbear, I just don’t think it will help Lemmy.world in the long run, as Lemmy itself by nature is going to attract Communists due to its structure.

            • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              15 days ago

              I dunno, I feel like anyone drawn to Lemmy for that reason will find lemmy.ml nearly as easily. If world suffers because of bad practices, well, that’s the way it goes. At least the fediverse lives on.

            • Pandantic [none/username]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              Honestly .world should have just blocked the most common shiposting Hexbear comms like chapotraphouse and dunk_tank as these are what most users found annoying. And I believe ther are more leftists on .world than one might think. There’s a great games comm on Hexbear too, and downvote away on the leftist game posts - Hexbear doesn’t have downvotes anyway!

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                15 days ago

                The problem is that Lemmy.world doesn’t want Communists using their communities, not that their users shouldn’t be exposed to Communist posts, because they wanted homogenous liberalism.

                There are some leftists on .world, but they usually leave in favor of leftist instances from what I have personally seen.

                Absolutely agree about Hexbear’s games comm, easily the best gaming comm on Lemmy.

          • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            Ada is okay with others chasing off people from the instance. Hard to say it’s a pro trans one after seeing multiple witch hunts done against a particular comm by one user and Ada just supporting the witch hunt

      • Ion@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Well that’s definitely your own experience on federated platforms, but I wasn’t speaking to that circumstance. I made a mastodon account and criticized our government’s massive funding of Israel in spite of our lack of critical infrastructure and healthcare and got spammed with “Israel has a right to defend itself, and you 're a trumper if you think otherwise” type comments by people that post one response and then immediately block you. Which is laughable and couldn’t be further from the truth. That is the perpetual echo chamber I was referring to from my personal experience.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        Are positive, liberal LGBT communities echo chambers

        Could be, especially if there aren’t a multitude of sentiments there. That doesn’t mean all sentiments must be present of course.

        Are they not allowed a collective space to hang out without having to explain themselves all the time

        I don’t think anyone said they aren’t allowed to have such a space.

      • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        16 days ago

        You’re in an echo chamber if you curate your home feed to only show one opinion and then never change it; it doesn’t matter what the opinion is

              • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                15 days ago

                This is where you implied it was an attack. By saying that I was drawing an image of people when literally all I did was an explain what an echo chamber was. I never passed judgement on you, or said anything about the diversity of opinions I partake in. You decided all by yourself to be upset about a simple explanation of what an echo chamber was. If you’re not in one, don’t worry about it lol

          • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            How did you take this as an attack? An echo chamber is the exaggerated idea of hearing only a single opinion, as curated to your own beliefs. It doesn’t matter what the belief is.

            Obviously no one is 100% in an echo chamber, but it’s also obvious that everyone is guilty of confirmation bias; and tend to prefer seeing their own opinions online. I never said anything about my own feed or accused you of being in an echo chamber. I just explained what one was because you implied that it’s impossible to be in a liberal echo chamber

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      It’s ironically more about certain instances creating echo chambers through constant censorship.

      Imagine an instance full of Nazi’s that only ever let’s Nazi posts stick. Is this if any value, or would defederating improve the quality of your experience?

  • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    free speech also applies to lemmy servers. If the server doesn’t agree with most of what’s on your server, they can and should have the option to not associate with your server at all. This honestly sounds like a shit take elon would have made.

  • anarchoilluminati [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    I think there’s benefit to blocking the particularly Nazi/pedo instances, but otherwise do wish we’d just all be able to federate together and share content for the most part.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      You’ll just need to find an instance that federates with most instances. I think that’s why I chose lemm.ee. A lot of them censored porn too which was lame.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    lemmy world admins cracking down on posts they don’t like with no accountability and arbitrarily changing their ToS after the fact to cover for it, but somehow the entirety of the factionalist weirdos who cling to the idea of a corpo-friendly Reddit clone are laying the blame on… other instances?

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    16 days ago

    I think it depends on what you disagree with. If one is promoting going after our neighbors, hunting them down and killing them? Yeah, defederate. If another is Meta trying to take over the federation. Yeah, I vote defederate. If one thinks Hawaiian pizza is a travesty and the other doesn’t, hold your horses.

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    I tried like 4 different lemmy instances before settling on lemm.ee because it hasn’t defederated from the socialists or “tankies”. So I can participate.

    This defederation fracturing lemmy really speaks to both self-censorship of allowable ideologies and also bad quality of admins and mods several servers.

    If lemmy can’t somehow federate communities separately from instances I don’t see lemmy thriving.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      Lemmy is thriving enough. Self-sufficient instances like Hexbear are fine without large amounts of federation. I do see Lemmy.world running into issues in the future due to their strong Zionist slant and anti-Leftist stance, but the other major instances seem to be fine.

      • Faresh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        I do see Lemmy.world running into issues in the future

        I think lemmy.world is already pretty bad. To get away from their posts and comments I’ve considered joining hexbear, since you people honestly have the best content and most wholesome community and aren’t federated with .world, but I also don’t want to be completely isolated from the rest of the fediverse. However, I just noticed there are only 5 instances in hexbear’s blocked instance list and plenty in the linked list. Maybe I didn’t notice how all other instances started federating with hexbear again?

        I don’t know what the “allowed” instance list means though.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          15 days ago

          To get away from their posts and comments I’ve considered joining hexbear, since you people honestly have the best content and most wholesome community and aren’t federated with .world

          Make an account, Hexbear is perfect for you. I made a Hexbear account a few months ago and enjoy my time there much more than I do here, there’s far fewer struggle sessions and the quality of discussion is much higher.

          I also don’t want to be completely isolated from the rest of the fediverse.

          The cool thing about Hexbear is that it has by far the most active userbase I have seen, it’s fully self-sufficient and you won’t likely miss the rest.

          However, I just noticed there are only 5 instances in hexbear’s blocked instance list and plenty in the linked list. Maybe I didn’t notice how all other instances started federating with hexbear again?

          Some instances have Hexbear blocked on their side that Hexbear doesn’t have blocked, so this can be misleading, however it’s mostly the right-wing instances like shitjustworks, lemmy.world, and lemmy.ca that are of note, and their content fine to drop.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            Have you visited Hexbear? It’s a very wholesome instance overall and posters are very supportive, assuming you’re a Leftist. What leads you to believe otherwise?

            • Juice@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              Lol when I got banned from a major comm for defending a trotskyist comrade, after two years of participation on the instance, I learned all about the wholesomeness of your “non-sectarian” instance.

      • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Yeah it is thriving, what I meant is that to have a chance to replace reddit, lemmy needs to find some technical solutions (moving / migrating / merging of communities) and somehow stop fracturing into islands.

        But maybe that age of the internet has passed and people are no longer willing because of trolls, bad faith actors, sock puppets, bots… and the increasing polarization of ideology and propaganda.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          15 days ago

          My point is that it doesn’t need to surpass Reddit, as long as its users enjoy using it then that is enough. Using Hexbear as an example, Hexbear doesn’t need any more growth, and is active enough to pretty much fulfill anything it needs on its own local instance.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Yes, I basically searched for which one is least likely to defederate from random shit.

      I’m prepared to traverse seas of horrors to bring home fresh memes every single day (except I sometimes skip alternating Tuesdays if I have to wait for too long to say hi to Reginald).

    • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      Meh, that’s kind of the point, no? Seems like it would be more jarring to only federate at the community level, as you either a) still have to interact with people from the unwanted instance or b) deal with randomly hidden comments from that instance. If the community dies because it’s on an unpopular instance, well, that’s the way it goes. Can always start up/join a community on another instance that’s federated with yours.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 days ago

    Some places suck.

    Some places suck, by design.

    Reducing criticism of systemic problems to “just because you disagree” is dishonest… and indicative.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    When Musk took over Twitter he allowed violent and extremist views to flood it without moderation.

    That’s the sort of community Lemmy would be if we didn’t have the tools needed to keep it clean of harmful ideologies.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        15 days ago

        When nazis start enforcing their ideology I will raise arms, until then your sentiment closely resembles the goal of propagandists on these sites: create division and cause violence.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          What are you talking about? Exploding Heads is a literal Nazi Lemmy Instance that was defederated by pretty much every major instance.

          Or are you going on an Anticommunist rant?

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            I have no context about the community, I assumed you were advocating for exploding heads of political enemies as a way of keeping feeds clean, because the comment explicitly reads as such.

            There is nothing communist about Nazis, just like theres nothing Democratic about the DPRK.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              15 days ago

              I have no context about the community, I assumed you were advocating for exploding heads of political enemies as a way of keeping feeds clean, because their comment explicitly reads as such.

              That’s certainly a leap. Exploding Heads is a Nazi Lemmy Instance.

              There is nothing communist about Nazis, just like theres nothing Democratic about the DPRK.

              So it was a random anticommunist rant, unprovoked, lmao

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                15 days ago

                If anything I said seems anticommunist to you then clearly you don’t know what communism is.

                You should start referring to the nazi community “exploding heads” as “the nazi community “exploding heads”” if you dont want people to think of heads which are exploding.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  I know quite well what Communism is, thank you very much. You’re openly pro-NATO and anti-Communist.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 days ago

          Anti-Trade

          What does this mean?

          Anti-NATO

          It’s good to be Anti-NATO, NATO has Nazi origins and serves as a way to maintain Western Hegemony, securing profits via Imperialism and defending said Imperialism through coalition.

            • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              15 days ago

              anti globalist, economically it’s just universally bad

              Right… NAFTA was universally beloved and was never taken advantage of by unsavory political characters. I’m sure you have some very unkind words for Biden after he continued and expanded Trump’s trade war.[/s]

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 days ago

                funnily enough my comment was removed, unsure why, pretty sure it was mostly accurate though lol.

                I’m sure you have some very unkind words for Biden after he continued and expanded Trump’s trade war.

                it’s a fine balance between putting a 20% tariff on literally every import (i believe trump wanted to do this) and putting a 100% tariff on chinese EVs to give the american auto market a leg to stand on.

                It’s a give and take, like everything is. But regardless, globalism is generally good for the economy.

                • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  It is weird that your comment was removed.

                  it’s a fine balance between putting a 20% tariff on literally every import (i believe trump wanted to do this) and putting a 100% tariff on chinese EVs to give the american auto market a leg to stand on.

                  Right this is the contradiction I was poking fun at.

                  Personally, I prefer the carrot to the stick approach. I think we should do more stuff like the chips act and less stuff like tariffs. This is especially true in the context of technology that aids in the transition to an economy that uses less fossil fuels. The ~$10,000 Chinese EVs would be a pretty massive tool in that arsenal. (Though not as good of a tool as they are in China because of China’s genuinely impressive rail system.) If you want more American made EVs —cool so do I— but we will get there faster with the right industrial policy. The tariffs do little to make that happen.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            15 days ago

            Lmao

            Mutual defense and deterrent to invasion by hostile world powers both in and outside of NATO is a bad thing? Sure, okay pal.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              15 days ago

              It’s an alliance between Imperialist countries, and the alliance itself has Nazi origins and has had Nazi leaders. Yes, it’s a bad thing, because Imperialism is a bad thing.

              It’s a gang of countries that hyper-exploit the Global South in mutual defense against said Global South.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                15 days ago

                It’s literally only function is a deterrent to war, including by members against others as they will not gain NATO support unless they are attacked.

                Its members might exploit, but thats a meaningless statement about NATO itself because without NATO there would literally be more war.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  It’s literally only function is a deterrent to war, including by members against others as they will not gain NATO support unless they are attacked.

                  It’s expansionist against the wishes of outside countries, and NATO exerts military pressure on the Global South.

                  Its members might exploit, but thats a meaningless statement about NATO itself because without NATO there would literally be more war.

                  Bzzzzt wrong. NATO’s only function is to preserve Western Hegemony and dominate the Global South militarily, so that member-States can continue exploiting ruthlessly unopposed. This results in proxy wars, such as the Israeli genocide of Palestinians.

            • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              .

              Also, don’t send us reports just because you don’t agree with someone. We’re not here to censor people for you.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                15 days ago

                Oh no! So you want to talk about how the mutual self defence pact is somehow oppressing you or will you just keep dodging forever?

                • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  Nato is as much a “mutual defense” pact as sea lions are lions. These guys bombed Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq and countless other nations. The members of Nato have repeatedly cooperated with each other, using the military networks built through the alliance to wage proxy wars, perform coups, destabilise regions of the world at a scale never before seen in human history.

                  You might as well call the axis a mutual defense alliance lmao.

                • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 days ago

                  Reason: User threatens me not to report his alt accounts for misinformation again

                  What alt accounts? What are you even talking about? That’s two bullshit reports in one day, wasting out time.

                  Reason: Claimes NATO forces other nations into subservience.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          I’ve got bad news for you: a lot of us are anti-NATO.

          Also, what the hell is anti-trade? Do you want every Westphalian state to build a wall around itself?

          Edit to add: Oh I see, you created this new account because @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today got permabanned from lemmy.ml 😂 Let’s see how long this one lasts…

        • graphene@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Ah yes, free trade, the thing that improved the economies of ex-communist countries after the USSRs collapse and is on the path to fixing almost every African nations poverty.

          Ah yes, NATO, the “we will only call for (and maybe possibly do something to enforce) human rights if it’s convenient for us” alliance. And I’m sure all it’s member nations have squeaky clean track records when it comes to international politics.

          We must ban anyone against these things! That’s dangerous extremist ideology

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            14 days ago

            NATO’s only function is mutual defense, NATO support ends when a member attacks.

            Since the only thing NATO does is prevent War, the only anti-NATO stance is a pro-war stance.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                14 days ago

                Are you referring to the coalition of some NATO members and some non-NATO members (19 nations total) enforcing a United Nations Security Council decision to make an immediate ceasefire and end the civil war in Libya?

                The one with zero troops on the ground?

                Being in NATO had no impact on the events, NATO member support was not mandatory as per the terms of NATO. The only reason they even call it a NATO operarion was because Itally would only vote in favor of the operation if NATO members were in charge instead of France.

                • IAmNotACat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  The reason for NATO’s involvement is quite irrelevant because they were still happy to step in and do the work. The fact is that it was ultimately NATO-led and their efforts did not lead to peace in the region.

                  To call NATO’s involvement in Libya ‘anti-war’ is sheer lunacy.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                15 days ago

                Well I certainly could make comparisons but thats a little irrelevnt. The core of my statement is that Lemmy doesn’t operate the way Twitter does.

                For me “the fuck is that question” is just a colloquial expression of confusion, not anger.

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    In aggregate; 5 instances, less than 5 communities, and more than 69, nice, blocked users.

    I don’t mess around. I don’t hesitate to block people who argue needlessly, make my experience less informational or less entertaining, troll, or disregard arguments made in foundational logic to push a point of view or ‘win the argument’. Similarly my instance ignores downvotes and does not display them; as with most platforms which behave similarly to reddit; they simply do not work outside of your personal, local account, local instance, user-sorting context.

    • Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      My instance removed downvotes before we even launched federation. Also more instances preemptively defederated with us before that even happened because they were scared of the evil tankies (which is funny because a bunch of us are also anarchists).

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 days ago

    Everyone likes dialectics and agree that it’s the best method to learn and move the thinking forward… Until they actually met with some antithesis of their thinking.