• FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    In America the Democratic party is made up of several sub groups. There are ‘Progressive’ Democrats, like Bernie Sanders, and ‘Conservative’ Democrats, like Joe Manchin. Largely the Democrats in America fall under what most people would consider to be Neoliberals.

    Due to America’s voting system third parties are often better off running under the banner of one of the two large parties, siding with the one they closest align with.

    People tend to strawman the entire party based on their most radical sects.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      People tend to strawman the entire party based on their most radical sects.

      The extremisim that a political party is unwilling to stop says a lot about the party’s principles, I’d think.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      which is why the Overton window always drifts deosil. Neolinerals are right leaning enough for them to lose their balance and take a step right every few years.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d argue it’s actually shifting left, and bumping neoliberal views left, and this has been happening since Clinton

        Arguably since Bush 1 since had more of a social focus than Reagan.

        The “bumping” is what you would describe is “taking a step right.” The more rightward neoliberal views aren’t a new right direction, but a refinement of classical ones (either through adaptation or loss of that part of the neoliberal base to R). E.g. libertarians should align with neolibs, but generally align R, largely due to social policy, they were lost via leftward shift.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Implying I like all of these changes is a bit of a reach. Social issues sure, but Biden is too protectionist for my tastes. Free Trade and open borders please

            • phillaholic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Free Trade and open borders please

              There’s no such thing as 100% Free Trade and Borders and there never will be. Trade restrictions are favorable to going to war, and a true open border is an excuse for every country to unload all their criminals.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sanctions are not generally considered when discussing free trade.

                I’m all about them sending their criminals. We’ll make em prosperous Americans instead. An accident of birth should not define where you live.