• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’d argue it’s actually shifting left, and bumping neoliberal views left, and this has been happening since Clinton

    Arguably since Bush 1 since had more of a social focus than Reagan.

    The “bumping” is what you would describe is “taking a step right.” The more rightward neoliberal views aren’t a new right direction, but a refinement of classical ones (either through adaptation or loss of that part of the neoliberal base to R). E.g. libertarians should align with neolibs, but generally align R, largely due to social policy, they were lost via leftward shift.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Implying I like all of these changes is a bit of a reach. Social issues sure, but Biden is too protectionist for my tastes. Free Trade and open borders please

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Free Trade and open borders please

          There’s no such thing as 100% Free Trade and Borders and there never will be. Trade restrictions are favorable to going to war, and a true open border is an excuse for every country to unload all their criminals.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sanctions are not generally considered when discussing free trade.

            I’m all about them sending their criminals. We’ll make em prosperous Americans instead. An accident of birth should not define where you live.