Drive encryption wouldn’t do anything to mitigate this though? A process running on your PC needs access to your drive, and so with the current setup you have either the option to trust 100% every software with your signal encryption keys, or to simply not use them.

Seems like a pretty big security flaw that we have actual solutions to.

You could maybe form a hackey way to allow only the signal process to an encrypted FUSE filesystem that decrypts its own keys on the fly, but again there’s already ways to do this in software that isn’t like using a wrench to plug a leak. (and this setup would just have it’s own set of keys that need to be protected now, probably by a traditional method like kwallet)

Yeah but they don’t have to be visible to every process the user runs, my Minecraft mods really don’t need access to my encryption keys

Yeah fuck security in layers, my first layer is 100% bulletproof so I got no reason to worry

Another NDA’d thing would be console integration, theoretically you could better optimize something for the hardware unlicensed if you had reference code

That just sounds like root with extra steps (trying to implement OS security policies in a remote terminal utility)

Dolphin may have uh a certain strong in there that correlates pretty close to a decryption key (legally of course)

Oh I see, have you tried file versioning?

It honestly sounds exactly like what you want, and the support is even built in to call an external command if you don’t like their default options provided

Is the roundabout way file versioning? Cause its been pretty stable for me, just toss a device with lots of space on the cluster and crank up the versions to your hearts content

To get a bit more technical, they build images in passes; each becoming more coherent than the last. This gives thsm a boost to understanding understand how ‘things’ relate to one another, knowing them by nothing but that relation. Light + light source being an example, and the angle of lighting being another deeper layer of that a - completed on a less noisy pass.

This is how its able to build images from its training parts, it sorta understands how each of them relate to some things, so its able to sorta organizes an image of random noise each pass, eventually creating a ‘unique’ image inspired by its training data.

It also gives it that perfect image you mention, cause its specifically trained to look like what looks good to us - its essentially a function optimised on nothing but.

Is it not common just to make something when you want it?

Maybe I’m too Canadian to understand but do you usually go out for meals?

They had it bad for sure but has the rate of decline really slowed?

Like sure buying a house is impossible, but shit that was a recession or 3 ago - and every single one has just pulled homeownership higher.

As easy as it is to say ‘back in my day’, I think its important to look at it numerically to avoid the mistakes of our ancestor’s (since at least baby boomers, but realistically probably even longer)

But also like your economy was golden compared to the current, at even fairly reasonable housing prices its still gonna be far out of most budgets for the foreseeable feature.

How bout you try and be a good parent and give your kid their best life regardless of things out of their control?

‘Apple is one of the better option privacy wise’

It’s to me intentional misdirection via generality I suppose.

Which I’d attribute to malice considering the amount of money its currently making

Fun analogy but uh that’s not all that scientific my guy.

Give me 5 min and I’ll draw communism as Chad then you’ll be fucked

I think its more the case that its too general, ie ‘all humans that died have drank water’ type of vibe, except in this case people start thinking their AI is gonna mold with alien technology and have sex with a super hero a-la Jarvis

I mean most houses crumble when you hit em with a tornado but were still building houses.

What i mean to say is I think we can agree there’s enough noise in most previous communism attempts, making them pretty shitty data to base your hypothesis off off

Pretty sure I remember that too, but believe there was some caveat like it only uploads when watching, making made it ‘more give less take’ on average

Lmao so measuring calories in food isn’t accurate cause you don’t consider it food when measured?

That’s gotta be the funniest counter argument I’ve ever heard

Lower latency and you’re usually able to get better quality for less bandwidth.

Its definitely a longer process to setup though