• flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    You know what happens when an entire nation is exposed to luxurious lifestyles of an extremely wealthy minority?

    Revolution. Revolution happens.

    Chinese politicians know this fact too well, that’s why they’re trying to make rich people hide their wealth.
    I mean actually fixing the problem is out of the question, that would be communism.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      you and me are probably exposed to extreme luxury from a minority, but revolution aint happening anywhere rn

    • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Communism wouldn’t fix much, and it would only be a temporary fix. It doesn’t work well at a larger scale which is why every country that has tried it has either fallen apart or turned into a dictatorship.

      We’re better off finding the proper balance between capitalism and socialism until someone comes up with a better system that actually works.

      • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean most houses crumble when you hit em with a tornado but were still building houses.

        What i mean to say is I think we can agree there’s enough noise in most previous communism attempts, making them pretty shitty data to base your hypothesis off off

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Communism is a house that crumbles on its own, fast, while producing tornadoes that take down other houses in the process.

          • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Fun analogy but uh that’s not all that scientific my guy.

            Give me 5 min and I’ll draw communism as Chad then you’ll be fucked

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Which Communist government existed in a world where othet countries didn’t actively sabotage it?

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Idk. That exposure happens here, and it mostly makes people go into debt trying to emulate the appearance of wealth.

    • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      China is “communist” in the same way NK is “democratic”. It’s just branding.

        • jorp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Capitalism only works in theory in practice it’s all homeless encampments, people going hungry, wealth inequality, gender inequality, race inequality, global inequality, climate disaster, war.

          Capitalism has never worked

          • NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            A balance between capitalism and socialism is what most countries are already using and has worked for a long time.

            Communism is the one that only works in theory and anywhere it has been tried has quickly led to dictatorships or else it has fallen apart.

            Edit: what most countries are using (not every country)

            • jorp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Social programs and social welfare aren’t really balancing socialism with capitalism, the means of production is fully owned by capitalists and there is no democratization of it. Sure we have some coops but the vast majority of workplaces are dictatorships

              • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yes workplaces are communist dictatorships. There’s one key difference between a workplace that is a communist dictatorship and a country that is one: you’re at that workplace by your own consent and you can leave.

                Communism is okay when people can choose it willingly and opt out any time. When that communist system is competing with other communist systems for resources.

                Also, the means of production are largely owned by workers in the United States, given how many companies offer stock to their employees, and how many people work for themselves, and how many people use their own tools, cars, computers, and kitchens to earn money.