• 8 Posts
  • 196 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 10th, 2023

help-circle





  • All of these are just willfully misunderstanding the point of these things to the point of idiocy.

    1. Usually, the rigid time constraints are shown to not work, and something else happens that solves the conundrum. Either that or the engineer overestimated the time with regards to security protocols, testing and so on, implying that cutting time will be significantly more risky.
    2. The shields are offline because power generation is failing. Diverting power from life support is the last resort, implying that either we get the shields online at the expense of long-term life support for a small chance at survival, or keep them offline for a guaranteed death. It makes sense to divert power from life support.
    3. They are frequently in unfamiliar or entirely deserted locations. Who has every close space station in mind at all times? Are you implying that someone on a long highway cannot be surprised by the distance to the next gas station if gas runs out?
    4. This never happened.
    5. This never happened.

    I always held the opinion that “treknobabble” was largely internally consistent and made sense within the established technologies of the universe, with notable exceptions in the biology department (TNG: “Genesis” anyone?). I dislike when people make fun of Trek engineer speech as if it was completely incoherent made up words á la “it’s a unix system”. “Treknobabble” is consistent and believable, and I don’t think it’s cute to insinuate that it’s all some kind of silly in-joke.


  • Reva@startrek.websitetoMemes@lemmy.mlWealth shown to scale
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    With all due respect; do you think that Marx, let alone Engels and myriads of Marxist thinkers over the centuries overlooked the idea that people are dependent on wages and therefore not likely to throw their lives to a revolutionary effort? I think the historical intricacies of revolutions are perhaps the most studied part of history for Marxists.

    That said, there is obvious truth in the fact that obviously people will not join a revolutionary mass movement today or even tomorrow in the world that we live in. The circumstances ought to be life-or-death for many of them to consider that much of a sacrifice; not that I advocate that at all of course, but revolutions have not historically been staged as fun and games for all those involved.

    The sad truth is that the permanent solution to our woes is a revolution that can only really happen when things are already boiling.









  • Liberal democracy has successfully convinced people that all political opinions are somehow equally valuable and worth protecting, as if political opinions were similar to favorite color, food preferences or support of a sports team.

    In reality, political opinions and their consequences decide over who is starving and who is not, whether there is war or not, whether humanity will survive or not.

    There is no such thing as someone I respect who I politically disagree with. Politics is a matter of life and death. I do not agree to disagree with someone who tortures LGBTQ kids. I want them dead. There is no civilized difference of opinion with advocates of genocide. They are to be removed.



  • Reva@startrek.websitetoMemes@lemmy.mlWealth shown to scale
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Marxism has a rich history of thousands upon thousands of books, millions of adherents, influential thinkers across nations, disciplines and social stratae; it’s not as if there is no-one with a solution on their hands. They are just being willfully ignored.