• 287 Posts
  • 746 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle






  • As far as I remember he was never called short in the books, right?

    Two things come to mind with that-- for one, there’s sort of a trope of the ‘little old guy who’s paradoxically, extremely dangerous.’ (and Gurney was the war-master, right?) Yoda and Gollum come to mind as pop examples, but the core of that might go back to folkloric, mythic examples, such as Rumpelstiltskin, fey faeries, elves and so forth. But I’ve also seen that kind of thing before in various modern lit.

    …And I kind of like it, frankly! You know, as opposed to the more common ‘look at me, I’m muscular and badass-looking’ character, which is kinda what Marvel/DC have flogged to death over many decades.

    The other idea is that concept art is notorious for being experimental, and of course, intentionally so. So an artist might create half-a-dozen odd character designs to show the production-designer / director, letting the boss pick and choose elements they like best to create the final physical version of that production’s character. All very SOP and common in these cases. So you might even find a concept drawing in which Duncan is the shrimp, and Gurney, the big, imposing guy. :D

    Eh, pardon the ramble. It just sort of popped out, haha.




  • Late reply, but this was such a crazy match. Karpov looked like he was running away with it via four wins in the first nine games, then Kasparov managed to draw 21 of the next 22 games to stave off defeat, before finally winning in game 32.

    The draws continued, and the stress of the match seemed to be getting to Karpov. Kasparov won games 47 & 48, and that’s when the FIDE president swooped in to abort the match. Really awful interference IMO.

    Karpov made the public statement that he wanted to keep going, but behind closed doors, one suspects he was desperate to have the match aborted. Thankfully, that was pretty much the end of his champion days. He later had the gall to say that if he’d won 6-0, Kasparov never would have been champion, which is utterly ridiculous.








  • A modern Israel never would have been necessary if Jewish people hadn’t been unfairly persecuted for centuries and then genocided in WWII, a good bit of that due to bullshit literature like “PEZ,” that sought to find external scapegoats for internal, national difficulties.

    Regardless of all these comments, there’s simply no good reason to start slinging shit in a post examining interpersonal conflicts within Israel. You are breaking the simple rules of this sublemmy (follow “netiquette”), and I don’t appreciate it.