https://www.youtube.com/@frasercain/videos

Consider this fact, some light waves like radio are large enough that a lot of matter is essentially invisible to their propagation; the radio waves just pass right by without any interactions. This becomes a similar problem when we try and measure such small quantum phenomena like zero-point energy. The quantum energy could be so small that they’re invisible to our detectors, but are in fact still there - the two scales simple cannot interact in a measurable way. So, there’d like still be some quantum energy, just less and less until our detectors could not interact with the incredibly small quanta for measurement.

This really nice girl back in high school, she was Mormon, asked, “do you believe in god?” I casually replied, “no.” She seemed so distraught, “it’s so sad you’re going to hell.” She went on to explain how and why. She seemed so committed but I always wondered if she really believed what she was saying, or was just following her religion’s teaching, like a method actor getting into their character. Perhaps she expected me to be scared or ask how to avert going to hell. I don’t know, but I disliked religion somehow more than I already did after that.

There’s some interesting ways of understanding “dark energy.” This is just one.

General relativity (GR), there’s also special theory of relativity (SR).

Here’s a simple video that helps one chance their frame of reference with GR.

Just about anything with “black,” or, “dark,” in its name, be very skeptical. 🧐 But quantum entanglement, that’s the good stuff. Only GR’s SpaceTime mechanics comes close to being as crazy.

This, 100%. Even when a case seems won, don’t give your opponent anything to muddy the water. I hope she owns this mistake and tightens her process.

Except for philosophers of physics…they tend to look, relatively stable.

I’m shocked, shocked I tell you!

T

Vote. Just, vote.

O

“….First time?”

No more impossible than any other precise quantum measurement. But that doesn’t have to be the goal post; indirectly making measurements, even on atoms worth of mass helps. Every time we change the setup, the mass, the temperature, the measurements, we can learn something new. Cast enough shadows from different angles and you’ll be able to model what’s casting the shadow. If you study condensed matter physics you’ll quickly learn there’s a lot to be learned and gained from indirect quantum measurements.

Love it - beam us some more.

“The Kremlin has never been richer – thanks to a US strategic partner”

I don’t know, maybe we should stop this…

Vote, vote and vote.

Depends on where. Where most the land sits on sand? Pretty bad. Mostly solid stone? Utter destruction.

For far too long people have been under the illusion that politicians try and debate in good faith and to some extent certain politicians do - Biden will spin facts into a better light or down play some issues; that’s politics, right? But Trump is everything bad in politics and perhaps humanity, all wrapped into one. To give that a microphone is bad enough, but to think you can “debate” such a thing, should be someone’s first and last mistake. It’s pointless because there’s no new perspective for Trump to bring to America’s current situation; Biden knows this. In many ways, you either vote against Trump because you know what he is, or you vote for Trump because you believe what he wants you to know; he only brings “alternate facts,” and again, Biden knows this.

Into a barrel of plutonium…