Giant black holes were supposed to be bit players in the early cosmic story. But recent James Webb Space Telescope observations are finding an unexpected abundance of the beasts.

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    *Billions (13,000+ million). Based on our current understanding and their close proximity to each other in the early universe, most of them would have likely merged and many/most may be now at a size where it would take a google years to evaporate. The extremely small ones that did not merge may have already evaporated.

    Source: Hawking radiation

    • chimerical@toast.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      From my understanding they would still have a looong way to go before they would have evaporated.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I thought so too but apparently the length of time it takes a black hole to evaporate is based on mass and those with a low mass — as in, the mass of the moon — should have already evaporated. Only supermassive black holes are the ones likely to take a google years to evaporate.

        Edit: none of the ones pictured are that small. We probably couldn’t detect them for hundreds/thousands of years (e.g. until solar system sized telescopes).

        • chimerical@toast.ooo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          According to this calculator a black hole the size of the moon would take 584,745,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years. I’m always open to correction though. (5.84745E44)