• Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Furiosa is 5 years too late. People who cared about her, stopped caring about the character years ago. They give us enough of her backstory in Fury Road. For viewers to know her history. If the viewer stops to connect the dots. So making this movie pointless.

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Your right, the new fans who were attracted to the franchise grew up and forgot about in that time. Why the Hell did it take 10 years to get another mad max(ish) movie out… its insane that it took that long.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Why the Hell did it take 10 years to get another mad max(ish) movie out…

        I mean, COVID set a bunch of films back, just for starters. After that, Idk. WB has been making some disastrous executive decisions since they merged with Discovery. I’m a bit amazed Barbie was released, rather than getting torched for the tax credit. Could be they sacked their marketing department and told an AI to do the job, and now its just gone underpromoted.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well the advertising sucks then, because I didn’t even realize this was out.

  • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    I really liked it. Bikes and cars go vroom, guns go bang, flamethrowers go woosh. 10/10. I’m contemplating going again next weekend.

    My roommate was bored. Didn’t like the writing, didn’t like Taylor-Joy’s performance. He rated it “not good.” I didn’t really disagree with any of his specific complaints, I just didn’t care about them.

    I suspect your mileage really depends on what kind of audience member you are.

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bikes and cars go vroom, guns go bang, flamethrowers go woosh. 10/10.

      That’s just it, I went in to see a Mad Max movie and that’s what I got. Very satisfied! I think anyone complaining about this movie went in with the wrong expectations. I told my gf before the movie, “I want to see high speed chases, shit flying through the air, explosions, stunts and at last one thing I’ve never seen before.”. I got all that shit and then some! Fuck yeah!

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        If I wanted to see that, and turn my brain off, I’d watch a Fast and Furious movie.

        Mad Max Fury Road was not a “turn your brain off” movie. It was extremely well written and acted. It ALSO had cars that go vroom and flamethrowers that go whoosh. It was one of the best movies of the last few decades. That’s a high bar to meet.

      • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Apparently a lot of people aren’t very thrilled about mad max movies, though. Most of the analysis seems to just be saying “it’s a R movie with niche appeal”.

    • skyspydude1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I adore Fury Road, and re-watched it the night after seeing Furiosa, and it’s definitely the far superior film. That being said, Furiosa is alright for what it is. It has far more plot and dialog, which I really don’t think was needed given what they managed with Fury Road, but was decently well written and fun enough.

      It definitely lacked a lot of the stronger feminist themes of Fury Road, which is honestly pretty funny given they’re almost 10 years apart. I’m 100% sure if they came out in the opposite order, Fury Road would be heavily criticized now for being “too woke” compared to Furiosa.

    • Fal@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is exactly the experience with me and my wife too. She was not at all impressed with any of the performances. And I don’t disagree I just don’t really care that much.

      Though it’s not even close to as good as fury road. I described it as “fine”

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      ADHD moviegoer, here; sounds like my kind of film. Dialog never mattered much to me because I can’t follow it half the time. Which really sucks because I can’t enjoy shows like The Wire, Sopranos, and Boardwalk Empire. People spend too much time talking and not enough time doing, and I just get confused and annoyed cause I have no idea what’s going on.

      • Mkengine@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        As someone with ADHD I now want a website tailored to ADHD moviegoers for recommendations, as I have exactly the same problems.

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    The movie is great IMO and deserves better… but I had to see it in a filthy theater with non-reclining seats on a screen that was so tinted in green that the reds looks like rust.

    Why are we supposed to pay for this experience?.. I literally would have been better off watching it at home on my crappy projector

  • SSTF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Furiosa was fine. In a vacuum, it was actually pretty good, but in being a sequel to Fury Road it can’t shake comparisons.

    I figure that it looking so visually similar to Fury Road in trailers made a lot of people ask themselves why even bother watching it when they’d already seen Fury Road. The title including “A Mad Max Saga” is clunky and throws up big vibes of this being a tack on story (which it is), which really doesn’t create the kind of hype wave needed to reach out to people who are already cynical about going to a theater.

    The word of mouth all seems to start with “Well it wasn’t as good as Fury Road, but…” which isn’t going to put a fire under the seats of undecided people.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Prequel

        You got me. It’s still a follow up movie that looks very similar but lesser in the trailers, and has a clunky title.

        Also Fury Road happens over 48 hours. Furiosa spans like 15 years.

        What does that have to do with people not watching it? I’m talking about marketing and word of mouth impressions. Plot details aren’t very important to that.

        • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          What does that have to do with people not watching it? I’m talking about marketing and word of mouth impressions. Plot details aren’t very important to that.

          I just think it’s unfair to compare the two when one movie is essentially one long chase sequence and another is a character focused story.

          • SSTF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I was speculating on why the movie is underperforming by looking at the trailers, thinking about how people might form opinions based on those trailers, and by using what the word of mouth I hear and snap reactions I read online. In this analysis, the deep plot details are somewhat unimportant. While it might be subjectively “unfair” to compare the movie to Fury Road, that’s what is happening.

            I’ve seen the movie, but I’m not factoring that into thinking about why a potential audience isn’t watching it. Because of course, the people who aren’t watching the movie, aren’t watching the movie.

            • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Honestly I had seen almost zero marketing. Had I not already been in a theater when the trailer came out I wouldn’t have known this movie existed until seeing this lemmy post, at which point I would have shat my pants at the excitement of knowing there’s a new mad max movie. So hopefully more people come out to see it now that word is getting around.

  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Other than the weirdly janky CG, which was both excellent in some parts while ruining my suspension of disbelief in others, I enjoyed it. No, it wasn’t as good as Fury Road but, let’s face it, that bar is so high it’s almost stratospheric.

  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    We get it guys, you didn’t go to the theater because you haven’t left your basement in 4 years. You don’t have to keep commenting that.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      My basement has an amazing home theater setup, complete with wet bar, popcorn machine, and a really nice recliner/couch set.

      Why would I pay $20 to sit in some ratty, smelly, flop house of a theater when I can queue this movie up in a few months for free and watch it in the lap of luxury?

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    If it’s a good movie more people will go to see it. Opening weekend is a reflection of the hype machine and expectations

    Not having mad max in a mad max film probably didn’t help the opening weekend.

    But a good movie will be good, and people will tell their friends, so let’s see what happens next weekend.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Opening weekend is a reflection of the hype machine and expectations

      Well, maybe they should have advertised it more. I didn’t hear anything about it until after it was released.

      Not having mad max in a mad max film probably didn’t help the opening weekend.

      Was there Mad Max in Fury Road?

        • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I guess I’m so used to having Mel Gibson as Mad Max that I didn’t really register that it was the same character.

          And isn’t that kind of the point, really? There was nothing in that movie that reflected Mad Max as a unique character, other than the “badass dude” heroic action-packed stereotype that we’ve seen represented in a hundred other movies. Hell, he talks so little in all of the movies that he might as well be one of those silent protags in an video game.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Fair enough, but madmax is literally the title character.

            Imagine a James bond film without James bond

            • Droechai@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Wouldn’t you want to see a prequel where you follow Q during college in similar vein to National Lampoon’s Animal House as well as a developing issue with the patent office where he tries to file more and more outlandish and dangerous inventions until British Secret Service finds out and recruits him?

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                That would be cool!

                Just don’t call it James Bond, if you call it James bond people will expect to see… James bond.

                Q: in her majesties service!

                • jet@hackertalks.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Imagine if they made a spin-off show from Better call Saul and named it : Saul - Chicken Run in a Winnebago and Saul barely showed up in it at all, maybe a few seasons in as a totally dismissable side character

                  People might get disappointed even if this hypothetical spinoff was quite good.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have no interest in seeing the movie. There’s just nothing there for me. I’m burned out on this type of stuff, and ready for more creative plotlines.

  • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Watched it over the weekend and was rather underwhelmed. It felt “cheap” compared to Fury Road. The CGI was quite terrible in comparison, especially when they showed some scenes from the last movie during credits. It’s just so obvious they paid less detail to the effects and it seemed like a significant decrease in their use of practical effects. Add to that some of the effects were just plain bad. AND worse of all

    Tap for spoiler

    They skipped the final fight scene completely!

    Also there was just too much talking. Fury Road was great because the world building was done without extra dialog. Furiosa just felt like any other Hollywood film with nothing special at all.

    • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I saw a clip of her crawling on the top of a truck with some kind parachute or something attached to it, and it looked fucking terrible.

    • Bgugi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      felt “cheap” compared to Fury Road. The CGI was quite terrible in comparison

      This was my impression from the trailer. Eh, I’ll catch it on streaming, eventually.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s just so obvious they paid less detail to the effects and it seemed like a significant decrease in their use of practical effects.

      When I saw the trailer that was my very first thought. “This is a cash grab that’s 90% bad cgi”

  • Subverb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I lost interest with Taylor-Joy playing the character to be honest. I’m sure I’ll watch it but not in the theater.

    This from a guy with an original Road Warrior theater poster in my garage and a hand-built, contest-winning Imortan Joe costume.

    • NIB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Other than the ending dialogue, which i wasnt a big fan of probably because of the writing, her acting is superb. She is almost always silent so that makes it even more challenging. Her eyes do the talking.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      She has like 30 lines in the whole film but she’s nailed Theron’s voice somehow. And for like first half of the movie, there’s even younger Furiosa played by different actress.

      • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I watched an interview with her where she said they used CGI to slightly alter the actress(es?) playing her younger self to look more like her (grown up).

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wait… theaters still exist? They were expensive before food prices doubled. How much are they charging for a bag of popcorn now? Do they accept bills less than $100?
    Is it all self-service now? Are we now expected to push <play> on the movie computer AND clean the theater before we’re allowed to leave? Are you forced to watch ads while you clean up?

    Ever since Jiffy Pop hit $50 at the self-service Dollar General, I barely leave home anymore.

  • solarvector@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Looks more like it mildly underperformed relative to the overall market being very low, and getting lower.

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I skipped Dune 2 in theatre’s. Watched it on Max last week. Why bother going to theatres?

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        There are a lot of movies I would agree with you on, but watching Dune (part 1 or 2) in the theaters was amazing. Having it on the big screen with theater level surround sound beats anything I have at home.

        • solarvector@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m really torn on Dune. I agree with everything you said, but once the runtime gets much past 2 hours I start worrying about how much my bladder is going to effect my enjoyment.

          But those two I did see in theaters and thought it was worth it.