• Belastend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    No, that is just how linguistics work. Language is decided descriptively, not prescriptively

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Nope, both descriptivism and prescriptivism have merit, depending on the specific case.

      A lot of people using a word as having the opposite meaning out of pure ignorance and/or carelessness is one case where prescriptivism is warranted.

      I’ll die on this fucking hill 😄

      • Belastend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        And you will die on a linguistically untenable hill. Redefining words had happened throughout history and language hasnt died out and its not gotten worse.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          And you will die on a linguistically untenable hill

          Is this your way of warning me against going hiking in Wales? 😉

          language hasn’t died out

          Of course not. That’s literally impossible. Don’t be fatuous, Jeffrey.

          and its not gotten worse.

          That’s of mixed veracity at best.