![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
The guy who put that high note in a drinking song is one of my favorite humans.
The guy who put that high note in a drinking song is one of my favorite humans.
Treating Bernie Bros and SJWs as interchangeable is a new one to me
He just hates everyone to Netanyahu’s left.
They’ll just ignore it and repeat themselves with more condescension.
Yeah, that Electoral College sure jumped right out in front of her, only giving her 227 years to prepare.
It’s never a neoliberal’s fault when they lose.
That would also be great.
“Both sides” people claim there are no important differences between the candidates or parties.
And it’s used by centrists as a catch-all strawman anytime someone complains about any specific issue in which there is little or no daylight between the parties.
But if they want to act like it’s ok to have a candidate that loses his train of thought during a debate, then suddenly it’s just fine because both candidates are like that.
Oh boohoo, my team didn’t win everything it wanted so I’m going to take my ball and go home.
Your team didn’t? Did Biden not move far enough to the right for you?
Still by far the most progressive president in my lifetime.
I see. He really isn’t far enough to the right for you. Well you should vote for him anyway. No matter who and all that.
Biden should have appointed someone better to head the DOJ, then.
So you understand the political reality and recognize that party leadership needs to adapt to the electorate they have.
deleted by creator
Democratic Party leadership has known this to be a factor for decades, and has steadfastly refused to adapt to the existing political reality.
Until it doesn’t.
Democrats used to trust polls, too. Now they only trust them if they confirm existing biases.
Yeah, they’ve been uploading the back catalog to youtube. It’s nostalgic to see all the problems John Oliver went into depth over that still haven’t been addressed.
You’re always trying to say they are the same.
He says in the comments section of an article that was posted to justify overlooking Biden’s debate performance because Trump has similar evidence of cognitive decline.
“You’re just saying both candidates are the same!” to all criticism from the left is inconsistent with “Biden’s fine! See, both candidates are the same.”
Seems to me that the model has some blind spots.
She is, yes, but that wasn’t the question. The question was about name recognition, which Whitmer has.
I wouldn’t be great with Newsom, either, since he’s been moving to the right to appease the republican-adjacent wing of the party. But either would be an improvement over Biden, who in turn is still preferable to Trump.
So even in the absolute worst case interpretation of this, there is nothing about the DNC claiming the right to dismiss its delegates.
Deciding in smoke filled rooms involves ignoring the charter entirely. Which the party argued in court that they could do. But they can’t now. Because centrist.
Russia didn’t force them to make that argument in court.
If you ever have a thought that isn’t a Clinton/Biden/Netanyahu talking point, let me know.
The only person to get that point in this century was Obama, and only in 2008.
The only one to win the Democratic primaries, at least.
I mean, there’s already broad bipartisan agreement on genocide.