• Lmaydev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The idea as far as I can tell is that it’s responsible for too many things and gives a massive point of failure.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Man, wait until these people hear about the filesystem and kernel.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        In some ways I think the filesystem is philosophically the exact opposite of systemd — I can boot my system with an ext4 root, with a btrfs /home…or vice versa. Or add some ZFS, or whatever. The filesystem is (with the exception of some special backup schemes) largely independent of the rest of the system, despite being of core importance.

        On the other hand, I can’t change my init system (i.e., systemd) without serious, serious work.