• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Exactly, I’ve railed on this exact topic.

    a screen offers no tactile feedback.

    You can learn what buttons feel like, and where they are (and the same for knobs) so yo ucan operate your vehicle without having to take your eyes off the road.

    Tablets are sleek and shiny, and fundamentally horrible as a car interface.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t necessarily have an issue with the screens. The problems are:

      Commonly accessed features like choosing a media source, setting environmental controls, or even lighting, are buried several “clicks” deep. These need to be surface-level and need zero distraction from driving to interact with.

      The “touch” part of touch-screen often sucks. Every car I’ve driven with touch interface requires too long of a press and/or doesn’t pick up the press. So you have to look away from driving to repeatedly mash a touch control. That’s not safe.

      The touch area is often too small, such as arrow buttons to raise or lower volume, skip a song, or change temperature. Not only do they not register the touch, they’re too small. Double whammy for distraction.