• zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes. Services like gas and water are natural monopolies - it doesn’t make sense to roll out two or three separate lots of distribution pipes, so you always just have one service available to you. The best option is to have them as government owned services.

        • candybrie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          How do you send different supplier’s water down the same pipes while making sure customers get the supplier they’re paying for’s water?

          • space@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Quite simple actually. The supplier knows how much water it puts in the pipes, and consumers have meters that measure how much water they take out of the pipes.

            Water is water… It doesn’t matter if you’re not getting the exact same water molecules put in by your supplier.

            Think of it like this… You have a jug of water. The supplier puts in a glass of water, and you (the consumer) take out one glass of water. The quantity of water in the jug stays the same, but you pay the supplier for how much water you took out.

            It works the same way with electricity.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Um… I’m perfectly OK with a “monopoly” for my fire fighting services. Why would I feel differently for my utilities services?