UK Labour are too Tory for me.
I’ve threatened that they’ve lost my vote. (edit)
On LGBTQIA, specifically trans rights.
On their plans for the NHS.
On their plans for health and wealth inequalities in the UK.
On their plans for the relationship the UK has with Europe.
They have to be less Tory to get my vote back.
It’s not acceptable that to not vote Tory, we have to settle for what they offer. They assume their position is acceptable.
If they correct their position, I’ll reconsider
@uk_politics

  • Colin@med-mastodon.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    @C4d Only if people fail to see that there are multiple narratives, which include telling Labour I require they change under threat of no vote. They like others know not of my intention, the cost to them is clear, a lost vote, which is what they require. They earn my vote, they work for it. Hopefully ppl who are dissatisfied will see that another way exists and instead demand better, not to succumb to their own apathetic thought processes.

    • C4d@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this argument (and your voting “power”, or at least your ability to directly influence the direction of a political party) would work better in a PR rather than FPTP system.

      At the moment, losing your vote may or may not cost anyone anything if you’re among a demographic that consistently votes one way or the other.

      If you had time on your hands, you could join the local representation of the party of your choice and begin to influence it that way. Unfortunately, not all demographic groups have the luxury of free time.

      • Colin@med-mastodon.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        @C4d Like I’ve said elsewhere, it’s a threat of a lost vote, that doesn’t mean I won’t vote tactically at GE. They can gamble that I and others will hold to our threat in their strategy if they wish. Just as they can if they assume that all polls assume a majority acceptance of policies, which is short-sighted IMO.
        They’ve been told they’re not good enough and have a threat of a lost vote because of it.
        Agreed, PR is better, Starmer has U-turned on that as well though.

        • C4d@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How have you told Labour? Are you organised? Apologies if you’ve already answered this elsewhere in the thread and I’ve missed it.

          Under FPTP, the vote on the right (Tory Party) has an advantage because the vote on the left is more split (Labour, Lib Dem, Green). I appreciate that independents and other parties exist (eg this thing called Reform on the right) or are being considered (have posted separately).

          In my area it’s a two horse race. I’m sure that’s the case in many areas.

          Depending on the voting patterns and margin in your area, FPTP may allow them to call your bluff. If over the course of the next year your area begins to poll as marginal, you may find you have more clout.

          It’s so unfair. But it’s how it works right now. PR can’t come soon enough. I’m saddened that it seems a long way off at this time.

          I’ll be voting though. It’s not put me off.