I rely on Bitwarden (slooowly migrating from… a spreadsheet…) and am thinking of keeping a master backup to be SyncThing-synchronized across all my devices, but I’m not sure of how to secure the SyncThing-synchronized files’ local access if any one of my Windows or Android units got stolen and somehow cracked into or something. I’m curious about how others handle theirs. Thanks in advance for sharing!

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is the way OP. Centralised services are just too much a target for bad actors.

      You already have syncthing so most of the way there.

      Also built in TOTP / 2fa is pretty great.

      • shiftymccool@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Also built in TOTP / 2fa is pretty great.

        I can’t wrap my head around how this is a good idea. Isn’t the idea of mfa to protect against password theft? If your second factor is stored with your password, how does that help anything? Honest question, I see this everywhere but can’t figure out why it’s acceptable with security-minded folks

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah fair question. IMO it def makes things less secure, but it’s a question of how much less?

          As in, if all my passwords are “sexG0d” then 2fa is critically important, but if all my passwords are long and complex and unique then 2fa is still another layer but it’s much less critical.

        • RobotZap10000@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          If someone were to pinch a password through a phishing site or a key logger they would still need to unlock your .kbdx file. The way I see it, if an attacker has cracked your database, you already screwed up 20 steps ago. (Sharing your .kbdx, using a weak password for it, not changing your other passwords) I think that 2FA on a different device is too much of a hassle for how much extra security it can bring.

        • Kayana@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Late reply, but for me personally, I started doing it because my Keepass database is already accessed using two factors (password and key file). Therefore, I’d gain very little by keeping the second factor of those sites external - essentially, those second factors are compounded into the second factor for the database.

  • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    Bitwarden already stores a local copy on all devices you have it installed. Just make sure you load up those devices from time to time… And guess what, you are probaly already doing that with your phone and laptop (which actually contains generally 2 copies, 1 on your actual client and another for the browser extension. Add a third device for good measure and… Oh, you also have a backup on bitwarden.com, this thing literally backups itself everywhere!

  • d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    if any one of my Windows or Android units got stolen and somehow cracked into or something.

    This shouldn’t be a concern if you’re using disk encryption and secure passwords, which is generally the default behaviour on most systems these days.

    On Android, you don’t need to worry about anything as long as you’ve got a pin/password configured, as disk encryption has been enabled by default for like a decade now.

    On Windows, if you’re on the Pro/Enterprise edition, you can use Bitlocker, but if you’re on Home, you can use “device encryption” (which is like a lightweight Bitlocker) - but that requires a TPM chip and your Windows user account linked to a Microsoft account. If that is not an option, you could use VeraCrypt instead, which is an opensource disk encryption tool. Another option, if you’re on a laptop, could be Opal encryption (aka TCG Opal SED), assuming your drive/BIOS supports it.

    TL;DR: Encrypt yo’ shit, and you don’t need to worry about your data if your device gets stolen.

    • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      do not do anything in this post until you have backups that you know run and work.

      device encryption is fantastic.

      • Dymonika@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m mortified to say I could certainly do more in this regard. Do you recommend a preferred method?

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          What matters is that the backups are done at the appropriate intervals and verified to be readable.

          You can figure out what interval is appropriate. Some people have to make sure every picture is saved, some people are fine losing a month of stuff.

          Verifying the backup is valid equally important. You don’t wanna find out it was misconfigured and didn’t get your user directories when you try to restore. Just open one up and look to see every once in a while.

          At least fifteen years ago you could set up windows backups through the control panel > backup or something menu. Now on 10 it’s settings > updates and security > backups.

          You can click add drive from there and designate a usb or something as your backup drive.

          Then set an alarm to make sure you remember to do it at the designated interval.

          With android the easiest thing is to sync it to a computer that gets backed up.

          You can use cloud services instead of a hard drive too, but often simple and easy to understand is the best place to start.

          Do you know why it’s important to have backups before using full disc encryption?

          • Dymonika@beehaw.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Right, I can imagine that I could lock myself out otherwise. Thanks for the walkthrough!

            • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              The lockout I see most often isn’t from people forgetting a password or key, but from motherboard failure with a key stored in the motherboards tpm or cpu.

  • zarenki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    For years I’ve been using KeepassXC on desktop and Keepass2Android on mobile. Rather than sync the kdbx file between my devices, I have each device access it through the network. Either via sftp, smb, or nfs, but regardless I need to connect to my home’s VPN to access it when away from home since I don’t directly expose those things to the outside world.

    I used to also keep a second copy of the website-tied passwords in Firefox Sync, but recently tried migrating that to Proton Pass because I thought the PIN feature might help, then ultimately decided to move away from that too and start using the KeepassXC-Browser plugin instead. I considered Bitwarden too but haven’t tried it out yet, was somewhat deterred by seeing people say its UI seems very outdated.

    • Dymonika@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It didn’t look outdated to me, but is kind of weird and hard to get used to, though I eventually did. I don’t know how to make an export from Bitwarden to take into KeePassXC, though… I’ll need to look into this. Perhaps it can’t be done from the browser alone. Anyway, thanks for sharing.

      • Daniel BP@fosstodon.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        @Dymonika @zarenki

        If you only have login names and passwords you can export to JSON and then import to KDBX using KeePass (works best) or KeePassXC.

        If you have attachments (key files, certificates, etc…) then you will learn Bitwarden is not that open as it advertises. You will need specific scripts to move your data…

      • not_amm@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Syncing files that you may open in both (or more) devices at the same time is unsafe with any service, but you can manage to avoid sync conflicts with KeePass if you do not open the same file at the same time or open the Android app in read-only mode. I’ve only had like 3-4 conflict files this year and they weren’t important.

  • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Im not sure if that’s what you mean but I just export the Bitwarden database in an encrypted json and have it backed up in cloud. I’m not sure why you need the backup synced with all devices tho

    • Dymonika@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I guess it’s in cases when I may not be able to use Bitwarden, but… I suppose it can be used everywhere! Clearly, I’m new to this thing, so that’s good to know!

      • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Oh, that changes things. So, Bitwarden can be used basically anywhere, as you said. Just log in and there you are. It’s even a website. They’re servers would have to die for it to be a problem. But that’s not a real problem actually as the app keeps a local copy on the device and every time you open the app, it syncs with their servers and updates the vault (database). So the devices are synced by default really. If you want to back it up anyway, there is a „export vault” button which you can use. If you choose with encryption it’s going to be encrypted with the master password I think :)

        PS Bitwarden (company) stores only the encrypted version on their servers so that’s not an issue either

        • Dymonika@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          PS Bitwarden (company) stores only the encrypted version on their servers so that’s not an issue either

          Whew, thanks!! They’re so Signal-level ingenious.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      My wife does the same, and I can’t tell you how many times a day I have to help her reset passwords, figure out if something is an “1”, “i”, “l”, or “|”, or decide what needed to be capitalized.

      Even though I have Bitwarden installed for her, she just “prefers” paper like some people prefer to stub their toes.

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        You should try to teach her how to be more careful and clear when writing passwords. It can be hard if she’s living in constant rush but it’s a very useful skill. And btw I just always underline capital letters. Always works

  • tiny@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Bitwarden keeps a local copy of the data that can exported if something ever happened to bitwarden. If you want to keep an encrypted backup you can export the CSV and store it on an encrypted drive as a backup but not big worry about syncing it to all devices

    • skilltheamps@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This is the correct answer, every device you use a bitwarden-client regularly on automatically becomes a backup

  • Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Bitwarden has an import tool. You should be able to convert your spreadsheet into the format they like and import relatively easily.

    For backups, you can create encrypted backups through bitwarden. So it shouldn’t matter if synching itself is a secure process as what your syncing is already encrypted.

  • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    KeePass on my phone and desktop, with the master file sync’d automatically to the server in my basement.

  • Joël de Bruijn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I prefer another tactic if I may share:

    • Database in production: let Bitwarden clients sync the native way Bitwarden offers.
    • Database in backup: let a dedicated backup service keep your database save.

    I dont know if this could be done automatic (just backup the production database) or if this has to be done by export (by hand once in a while).

    Doesnt matter from which device the backup originates because the native sync will keep them all the same usually in seconds.

  • pol5xc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Pass on Linux with a private git repo with search extensions for gnome and Firefox, and android password store on my phone.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have encryption enabled on my devices. If they get stolen, a casual thief isn’t going to be able to break it. At most they’ll wipe it, but they’ll probably just fence it as-is or for parts.

  • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Proton Pass. If you’re comfortable with cloud E2EE managers, it’s far more worth it than Bitwarden, since you get unlimited email aliases. Better for privacy and even security. Plus, I trust Proton, they have a phenomenal track record in terms of security and encryption.

    • Dymonika@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      they have a phenomenal track record in terms of security

      I read that they have bowed to email subpoenas in the past.

      • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Every company would. They’re not going to go out of business over one customer. What’s important is that they weren’t able to give any important information.