• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    AI rights.

    I’ll say something like “I don’t see why a fancy python script should be allowed to vote” and the youth will be like “that’s so fucked up in so many ways”. “My best friend is an AI why are you so prejudiced”.

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m of the generation which has kids old enough to talk.

    They are exasperated that we use computer mice.

    They are angry that the environment is still being destroyed even though grown ups know better.

    Not sure what will embarrass them when they’re older - at the moment it’s our clothes, shoes, music, and slang.

    • aramus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They are exasperated that we use computer mice.

      So they use Tiling window managers and vim-keys? The future is bright!

  • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Transphobia.

    It’s just an echo of the homophobia decades earlier, and it’s going to be seen as equally ridiculous at some point

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I try to emphasize this point to people who are dispairing over the current political climate. Public opinion towards gay people also had a backlash when we demanded rights. Many countries have moved beyond that fairly quickly. I am still not dropping by Uganda anytime soon, but at least I feel fairly safe in my own country.

      Transphobia is much less prevalent in the younger generations, just like homophobia. It will literally die out.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        But…like…aren’t we still dealing with homophobia from the olds? It definitely died down and has morphed into mostly transphobia now, but it’s not like everyone is cool with it these days.

        • pingveno@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sure, and it will be a factor for a long time. But it should be considered in comparison with similar historical processes. Think civil rights for Black people in the US. I’ll pluck a few dates:

          • First slaver ship, 1619
          • Abolitionist movement starting in 1688
          • Dred Scott decision 1857
          • American Civil War 1861-1865
          • Jim Crow laws beginning in 1870’s
          • Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896
          • Brown v. Board, 1954
          • Montgomery bus boycott, 1955
          • Voting Rights Act of 1965
          • Crack epidemic and subsequent mass incarceration, 1980’s and 1990’s
          • George Floyd murder, 2020

          And after all that time, Black people are still disadvantaged as a whole relative to white people. Compare that to the modern LGBTQ movement. The modern movement really began in earnest with the Stonewall riots in 1969, but it has roots dating back to Berlin in 1897. Gallup has poll numbers going back to 1977 for various questions. Around 70% of Americans believe same sex marriage should be allowed. Attitudes towards equal job opportunities are nearly unanimous in favor, 95%. That said, it’s notable that most of these questions are about policy, so they may treat gay people poorly in their personal life. So whether you’re measuring by Stonewall or by Berlin in 1897, progress has been relatively rapid. Not that it’s ever rapid enough for people suffering under oppression, but progress runs on a generous dose of hope.

        • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          “To reduce global suffering” yes that’s the eco-fascism. Population control is the eugenics equivalent of austerity. You don’t get to tell anyone for any reason if they’re allowed to have children or not. That’s not your call, that’s not anyone else’s call but the parents’.

          Not only is it deeply immoral, like all fascist pseudoscience, it also doesn’t work. Just ask China’s population control policy how that went.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Growing up r***** was a pretty common phrase, that’s definitely something some millenials have had problems removing from their vocabulary.

    I also don’t think our social comprehension of gender has finished evolving yet. So everyone alive to read this comment will eventually have to revise their understanding and look back on their cringy previous views.