• TangoUndertow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    It feels like she knew she would get fired from this new job, leverage it nationwide articles and get even more subscribers to her OF page. She even references the teaching gig in her bio, and the new job in her latest posts.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Maybe. It doesn’t matter. Jobs shouldn’t be able to fire you because you get naked on the Internet, which requires you to pay to even see in the first place.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Eh I disagree with some jobs. Teachers are supposed to be role models to students and keep certain things private.

        The problem is we aren’t paying teachers adequately for that. It reminds me of essential workers during the pandemic. If we need these people so badly, or we’re asking them to be role models and be private about certain things, then we should be paying them much, much more.

      • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m a teacher and they specifically have guidelines on what you’re behavior online should be. Keeping your socials clean. Making sure my interactions with students are kept professional.

        The fact is that kids these days are nosey and great researchers. Having an only fans as an educator has a huge risk of students discovering it, and will ultimately change the relationship between student and teacher from a student/ teacher relationship to a viewer/ pornstar one.

        • summerof69@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          to a viewer/ pornstar one

          And depending on their age, they might even have sex. People want one easy solution to all problems, but being a teacher and a regular office worker is not the same, hence the standards are different too.

      • Imalostmerchant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Gonna get roasted for this, but why?

        I think it’s pretty reasonable for an employer to fire someone for posting racist things on the Internet. I think we can all agree on that. Actions outside of work can have an effect on work and so I think it’s reasonable to make employment decisions based on how the employer acts outside of work. I would argue racism is morally wrong and sex work is not, but I don’t think it’s possible to define employment laws in a way that fits a universal moral code.

        I love the protected classes we have for employment now: age, gender, color, religion, etc. I think these protections are valuable to employees everyone, and I think they make sense because they don’t affect your ability to do the job. I having “does sex work on the side” on this list makes much less sense.

        I think many, maybe even most, jobs wouldn’t be affected by an employee having an onlyfans, and so in my opinion someone shouldn’t get fired for it most of the time. But I think there’s a clear line between the protected classes and people who post on onlyfans.

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Her job doesn’t get to decide what she does in her off time. Of course on the streets of the real world they definitely try and succeed. I’m saying that they should not.

      God i just want the world to change for the better. This is dumb