• Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’d be more inclined to see your point, except that the manager in question said “each job requires 2 weeks notice” like he was indignant that he didn’t get something he deserved.

    That’s not only not true at all, it’s active manipulation on their part in a hail Mary attempt to have their work covered for enough time to look for another employee.

    It may be unprofessional to quit without notice, but it’s really unprofessional to present the act of quitting as requiring 2 weeks’ notice, particularly in a place that might also allow the employer to fire someone for any reason at any time with no notice.

    • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      it’s really unprofessional to present the act of quitting as requiring 2 weeks’ notice

      If it’s part of the contract then it’s not unprofessional at all to bring up the terms that you’ve agreed on. My job requires a month’s notice and it wouldn’t be unprofessional for my employer to bring that up if I tried to quit on the spot.

      That being said, I don’t live in a place with “at-will employment”, which is a fucking travesty and should never have been allowed in the first place.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Mine tend to ball out to a month’s notice (on either side) for every year employed at the company…but i do business critical shit. I do not get the impression this is what is in the text conversation depicted.

      • Rev3rze@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m not from the US but I always assumed “at-will employment” works both ways. You’re telling me it doesn’t?

        • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s not typically written into the contract for most jobs I’ve seen, but it’s still considered very unprofessional to leave without giving the company time to find a replacement. It doesn’t just mess with the company or your boss; it messes with your coworkers, too, who now have to pick up the slack.

          Basically, while it’s not written into your contract, it’s still considered socially unacceptable not to give a two week notice barring any unusual circumstances.

          • techt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            It’s not unprofessional at all; at worst, it’s discourteous, because notice of departure has zero to do with your professional conduct, it’s a courtesy. You can professionally quit on the spot, look:

            “Due to a change of personal circumstances, I will be resigning immediately, effective at the end of the day. I will work with you to make this transition as smooth as possible within that timeframe, but it is not negotiable.”

          • Taleya@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            If it’s considered ‘unprofessional’ then that is a raging misconception. At will contracts also mess wirh the company and your coworkers, demanding a courtesy you won’t give your workers is horseshit.

          • Syndic@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Na my dude, as long it’s not considered at least as unprofessional for companies to let people on the spot they can go an fuck them self.

            Want a mandated notice period? Put it in contract for both parties. That’s how it works in countries with sane worker laws.