The French government issued a decree Tuesday banning the term “steak” on the label of vegetarian products, saying it was reserved for meat alone.

  • Ey ich frag doch nur@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh we’re good at this. In the whole EU it’s not allowed to print ‘milk’ or ‘cheese’ on something that doesn’t contain actual animal’s milk. Want to sell soy milk? Ok but don’t call it that way…

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s weird, since “milk” in English has included plant milk longer than the taxonomic definition of a “mammal” has existed.

      • ian@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        We’re not allowed to call part of the night sky, the Milky Way any more.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It actually is allowed for German “Scheuermilch” (“scouring cream”, which is a cleaning detergent, literal translation: “scrubbing milk”).

    • skele_tron@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Germany has a whole line of not milks, almost chicken, like chicken, thun visch and i can almost be certain i saw mjolk and moloko somehwere. I always chuckle a bit when i see it.

    • muelltonne@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can tell you a little about how Germany does this and I think the rest of the EU & France should be similar. There is a government body defining what specific foods are and if your food doesn’t match that, you can’t name it like the food in question. And that does make sense - butter has to be made from milk and not some palm oil mixed together by shady businesses and milk has to come from an animal and can’t be water & white paint.

      This does make sense and really protects the consumer. It does - however - really run into problems when dealing with those vegetarian meat replacements. It would make sense to sell a “vegetarian ham”, but ham has an exact, legal definition and part of that definition is that ham has to contain meat.

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        So cocoa butter, peanut butter, and other nut butters are out.

        It’s dumb. It’s not about protecting consumers, it’s about protecting corporate interests.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Cocoa and peanut butter got grandfathered in. If they were to be introduced to the EU market today you’d see them called cocoa fat and peanut creme.

      • Zitronensaft@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I find it helpful to have the thing being imitated as part of the name, but not the full name. It makes for an easy way to know what the taste and texture should be and how it can be used in cooking. My kid developed a dairy allergy recently and vegan butter in particular is so easy to substitute in old favorite recipes without changing the flavor much or cooking method. As for meat imitations, a “vegetarian steak” (or ham) label conveys a lot about the texture, moisture, saltiness, and cooking techniques you can expect to use while a generic name such as “plant protein block” leaves you much more clueless as to what the texture and cooking method is meant to be for that item. I don’t think it should be legal to sell plant substitutes as only “steak “ or “butter”, but calling it “plant steak” or “plant butter” is way more straightforward and easy to fit on a label than a lengthy description of “plant patty with a fibrous, chewy texture and savory flavor resembling steak.”

      • occhineri@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        A milk is what I mix with my cereal, pour in my coffee, use in a pancake mixture and so on. I can’t see any logic behind limiting this to animal products other than a political agenda.

      • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        butter has to be made from milk and not some palm oil mixed together by shady businesses and milk has to come from an animal and can’t be water & white paint.

        No it doesn’t. I used plant butter and plant milk in all my recipes and it was fine.

    • SkippingRelax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sorry you are saying you can’t call something that is not cheese ‘cheese’? Preposterous.

      • Ey ich frag doch nur@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well to be precise you’re not allowed to label any agricultural product cheese that wasn’t made of milk.

        There are only some exceptions for traditional things like Leberkäse

      • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Cheese is what comes from under my girlfriend’s foreskin and I am OUTRAGED that bad-faith farmers are selling rotten cow’s milk under the name cheese.

        /uj words have multiple definitions, genius