Exclusive: Family calls for inquest, saying Wilkinson visited police ‘almost every day’ before she was murdered by her husband in 2021

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    “cop shopping” is also known as “finding a needle in a haystack” or “the one cop that will do the minimum of their job”.

    At the beginning of April 2021, police charged Johnston with four serious domestic violence offences against Wilkinson. He was given watch house bail.

    In the weeks that followed, Wilkinson attempted to speak to police “almost every day” about her concerns in relation to Johnston, her sister, Natalie Wilkinson told the Gold Coast Bulletin in 2021, including allegations he had breached the conditions of his domestic violence order.

    Another sister, Danielle Carroll, said at that time that Kelly had told police, “I am scared for my life, I am scared for my children’s life. We are not safe”.

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yes, cop shopping, i’m in here repeatedly trying to get even one of you to give a shit, and you’ve got a perjorative term just ready to hand for that exact situation.

    Policy against giving a shit would go with the territory I suppose, pathological fucking institution.

          • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            We’ll throw complaining about the calibre of people in the spaces you decide to frequent voluntarily on the pile with the rest of your dumb bullshit.

              • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                It’s all about you, isn’t it? Not as though I’ve been a presence in this thread or anything.

                Best way to avoid me would be to stop posting such aggressively stupid bullshit.

              • Muddybulldog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                The irony of you tooting about 1A, celebrating your “right” to free speech, based on your ability to post something in a forum where 1A doesn’t apply.

                It’s delicious.

              • Sacha@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                You make it sound like thats unique to the US and a foreign concept to the rest of the world.

                Freedom of speech doesn’t mean you won’t face consequences of what you say.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I love the duality of Lemmy users:

          “Ohhh nooos we can’t depend upon the police!”

          “Ohh nooos how dare someone suggest taking agency for their own safety ! 2A is baddd mmmkay!”

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        If only you supported education, more specifically geography, as much as you pretend to support the Constitution.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          No I fully support the constitution and wish the amendments were universal human rights, not just American rights.

          • Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            wish the amendments were universal human rights, not just American rights.

            No thanks. You can keep your constitution. Ours isn’t perfect either, but I prefer it to yours.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            So you want more deaths in the world?

            Well I don’t.

            Any country where you need a gun in order to feel safe is a shithole.

            • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Weird flex but ok. I suppose if you are privileged enough to stay in a country with no violence you should probably stay there.

              For everyone else, we like our rights to self defense.

          • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            A populace with the ability to kill anyone with the press of a button isn’t free or safe - it’s fearful, which is a dangerous thing to be when you have a gun.

            Gestures lazily at gun deaths per capita compared to the rest of the developed world.

            There’s also the 13th - Slavery is fine so long as we criminalise you. Why the fuck would you want this, exactly?

            Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

            The deification of the founding fathers - a bunch of slave owners and the like is deeply weird. They had some good ideas… and some atrocious ones.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    a friend of mine did the same thing before her domestic murder. the police (who are well funded in this town) did not want to take her seriously, and they did nothing. another friend helped her out and was subsequently murdered too.

    • EchoCranium@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sorry you lost friends that way. Hopefully the asshole that did it never sees the outside of prison ever again.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nooo. Like their cars say, they’re there to protect and to serve and-… Oh, I see how they may have slipped up on this one. And maybe in a few other incidents… Regularly… All the time…Okay, you have a point.

  • AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    When I tried to report my suspicions that my ex was abusing my kids, I was told by DCFS to stop stirring up trouble or I would lose custody.

    Years later, my kids are old enough to be listened to, and the DA office still chose not to prosecute because it’s he-said-she-said. Both kids have mental health issues stemming from child abuse that I have to deal with on a daily basis, all while trying to juggle my mental health as a previous abuse victim from the same man.

    And then they say that victims fail to report. Well, duh. It’s often safer not to.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      My sister ended up losing custody for the same thing.

      I begged her not to do it because I knew exactly how it would go. I said, “Seriously, you’re in a custody dispute. They’re going to treat you like you’re making this up. Wait. Be patient. I know it sucks. It just isn’t the right time for it.”

      The kid is very autistic and he sits and yells at himself now, “You’re just bad Adam! You do this on purpose Adam! That’s for girls Adam! You’re not a girl Adam! You’re just a troublemaker Adam!” I wish I could remember what my mom told me he was yelling at himself about the other day, she was in tears.

      I don’t know. It’s a sad situation. Her ex definitely has better resources for dealing with him (financially, which is a lot with autism as bad as his) but I can’t imagine him yelling criticisms at himself all the time if my sister didn’t lose him. He was allowed to express himself and dance and play dress up before. He don’t have that any more. Because he likes Disney princesses a lot and she had photographed him playing with dolls and things, they made a big deal about that in this small town.

      Sad situation.

      • AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I wasn’t even in a dispute. I had full custody, and he had minimum visitation, which was still half the kids’ free time. And he had been convicted of domestic violence.

        That poor, sweet child. We are failing our children in the guise of parent’s rights.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          My sister has been through it, she really has.

          The guardian ad litem hates her guts and has practically dragged her through hell.

          When Adam was about 3 it really became clear that something was off with him. You couldn’t get his attention unless he wanted you to have it. He’d run in circles for long periods of time. I joined him once and I started running in the other direction and he lost his shit.

          He started taking shirts and using them like wigs and singing Disney songs, and it was a huge leap in his development so my sister got him some wigs. It wasn’t just princess wigs, he had a bunch of them. Short hair, long hair, Halloween costumes as Batman, but he really gravitated toward the princess stuff. She didn’t put a limit on him or encourage one thing or the other. The ex said, “you’re gonna make him gay letting him wear that stuff.” My sister’s response was, “He isn’t going to have much of an opportunity for a sexuality, you’re overreacting.” And in truth, I can’t see him ever having a life where he’s going to be dating and things like that. It just isn’t going to happen. He communicates his needs, but he isn’t ever going to be able to be independent.

          And even if he could, he makes his own decisions. When it’s time to pick out his clothes, he doesn’t try to wear dresses. It’s just an outlet for him while he plays. He understands that he’s just reenacting what he sees. He likes what he likes.

          Well, once the guardian ad litem heard about that, it was 100% what she focused on. She said in court that my sister was encouraging him to be a girl and confusing him. She went in and photographed his costumes, purposely leaving out the cowboy and superhero stuff, the pompadour, the ninja turtles. She photographed the princess stuff and the dolls.

          It’s a bummer. I’m not gonna lie, the first time I seen him twirling around singing “Let it Go” in a blonde wig, it made me uneasy. But seeing him smile and laugh when he usually sits expressionless was huge.

          It sucks that we put so much into our roles in this world that a happy kid has to question his happiness when so many doors are closed to him already because of his condition. It really does.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            “you’re gonna make him gay letting him wear that stuff."

            I can’t understand how people can be this ignorant and stupid…

            • BringMeTheDiscoKing@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              You may have meant this more of an expression of shock, regardless it is good to think about the question. Hope you don’t mind if I run with it for the general discussion.

              Babies and children have an innate desire to learn, which can be nourished or beaten down. If it’s beaten down long enough, “Ignorant” may become that child’s preferred state as they get older, for reasons of domestic safety and social norms.

              This lack of respect for knowledge and the accompanying lack of knowledge makes things that are outside someone’s worldview threatening. They respond as if it was a threat and the cycle continues.

              It is supposed to be the job of schools to rescue children from that cycle, by providing them with a space where they can be curious and not have to worry about a bigoted family member coming down on them. Sometimes they succeed but I think more often they don’t, especially in areas where bigotry is rampant and/or where schools are underfunded or beholden to antisocial policies and laws.

              I’m on a long bus ride, hence the exposition :)