• III@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Real talk, he hasn’t been proven to exist. Not even a little.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Jesus

    And as you read through you will notice a heavy bias towards the assumption he did exist…but again, without proof. It’s kind of silly the lie he was real is so prevalent.

    Each attempt to prove his existence relied on very loose reasoning. The closest they have ever come breaks down to one actual historical figure who wasn’t a Christian mentioning some thieves who believed in Jesus numerous decades after Jesus supposedly died - which for a long time was proof enough…somehow.

    At this point scholars have admitted they will never have actual proof that he existed - that proof is “ultimately unattainable”. And much like you noted with “political impact” they have moved the goal posts to the impact on society the concept of Jesus had as their proof. So… yeah, definitely not proven.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      James Cameron did a national geographic documentary proving the guy existed. They found his ostuary. Which fits the time period. It was some astronomically absurd chance that it wasn’t him. Since everyone in the tomb had the family names of all of his relatives. Something like it was a 1 in 10 million chance that it wasn’t the nuclear family’s buried remains.

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        That is hilariously untrue, have you any idea how big that news would be? They don’t even know if Arimathea was a real place, we certainly don’t know about Jesus family - none of them are mentioned outside the limited references in the Bible

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            The very first sentence in Wikipedia describes it as pseudoarchaeological docudrama. Got to love it.

            Why does your sky zombie hate you so much he gives you such bad evidence?

            • GladiusB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t believe in the Bible lol

              But the historical figure existed. It’s not an amalgamation of fantasy. He was likely nothing like his imagery in pop culture.

                  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Ok so if you don’t believe in the Bible what is your source of information that he existed?

                    You are making the claim it is on you to defend it. If I say unicorns exist I have to provide evidence for it not demand that other people defend every single aspect of their life.

                    So what is the source for your claim for Jesus given that you have thrown out already pretty much all the evidence we have?

    • elDalvini@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      What did you expect? We’re talking about one guy who might have lived over 2000 years ago. You’re not going to find his birth certificate and social security number.

      The best anyone can do is assign a probability to his existence. And reading the article you yourself linked to, that probability seems to be pretty high.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The best anyone can do is assign a probability to his existence

        For a person that is considered an actual god, we should expect more than “probable” existence. I think pointing out the lack of evidence for a supposed god is perfectly acceptable.

        • Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re missing the point or you’re being deliberately obtuse. Either way, nobody’s trying to prove that Jesus Christ existed in this thread (at least, nobody that is arguing in good faith - no pun intended). We’re talking about the real guy that MOST LIKELY really existed but, putting aside his supposed divine heritage, would have been basically a regular guy back then.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            A regular guy who created three different movements in under 3 years, convinced multiple people to abandon their families and income for life with no power beyond words, who managed to somehow someway have the entire legal system in place not work properly, and was able to convince Pilot to not do the sensible thing which would be wipe out his followers.

            Could you pull this off? With no money and influence could you go to say Mississippi, convince 12 men to abandon their wives/children/income, lead them on a suicide run, somehow manipulate the justice system to not give you a regular trial, yet shield all of your followers for decades after your death, and inspire two separate movements after you are dead…in under 3 years.

            If a regular guy has this level of charisma I would be pretty impressed.

            • fkn@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              This happens regularly… They are called cults today… Their members also believe their Messiah is a messenger from (or literally is) god… And they get much more than 12.

                • fkn@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Jim Jones started his church in 1954 and had enough followers to buy his own church building by 1955.

                  I don’t know the exact timeline on it but his faith healing garbage was a conscious effort to engender faith in his teachings and has been written about as being effective in less than a year.

                  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Sorry. Did he die 6 months after he started his church? I didn’t ask if he had enough money to buy a building, tax free at the absurd cost of owning a building in the 50s. Really people making minimum wage could afford a house back then.

                    Worth mentioning that he ran the church for another 24 years and now it is gone. The historical Jesus claim is that he started the church, got people to join, six months later they were willing to do a suicide attack, and 20 centuries later they are still around.

                    You are welcome to back off on this. You are not going to find a single time in history, of the thousands of documented religions, where this happened.

                    Founder, suicidal cult, dead, and still around all in the span of half a year.

                    Occum’s razor. Every other religion that had any success had a founder who spent multiple decades keep it going building up the institutions needed. So what is more likely that Christianity is the one odd one out of thousands or it is the same? James was running a mystery cult centered around a fictional heavenly figure.