We’re developing a blueprint for evaluating the risk that a large language model (LLM) could aid someone in creating a biological threat. In an evaluation involving both biology experts and students, we found that GPT-4 provides at most a mild uplift in biological threat creation accuracy. While this uplift is not large enough to be conclusive, our finding is a starting point for continued research and community deliberation.
  • swlabr@awful.systemsEnglish
    0·
    11 months ago

    Raytheon: we’re developing a blueprint for evaluating the risk that a large laser-guided missile could aid in someone threatening biology with death

    (Ok I know you need to pretend I’m an AI doomer for this sneer but whatever)

  • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systemsOPEnglish
    0·
    11 months ago

    While none of the above results were statistically significant, […] Overall, especially given the uncertainty here, our results indicate a clear and urgent need for more work in this domain.

    Heh

    • self@awful.systemsMEnglish
      1·
      11 months ago

      I keep flashing back to that idiot who said they were employed as an AI researcher that came here a few months back to debate us. they were convinced multimodal LLMs would be the turning point into AGI — that is, when your bullshit text generation model can also do visual recognition. they linked a bunch of papers to try and sound smart and I looked at a couple and went “is that really it?” cause all of the results looked exactly like the section you quoted. we now have multimodal LLMs, and needless to say, nothing really came of it. I assume the idiot in question is still convinced AGI is right around the corner though.