• Ĺįĺįţĥ ţĥę §ęŕpęŋţ🍏🐍@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Billionaires shouldn’t exist. Everything after $999,999,999 should be taxed 100%. There is absolutely no reason for anyone to ever have a billion dollars. All that tax could pay for universal health care, free education, ending hunger, and homelessness. Billionaires are the problem.

    • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Do billionaires actually have billions of dollars cash?

      Everything after $999,999,999 should be taxed 100%.

      This implies it’s income, although if it’s taken as assets + unrealized gains then that would be very cool. Each year, anyone with cash + assets over $999,999,999 will get a bill from the IRS for the entirety of the overage. That would put sell pressure on real estate and stocks while funding (hopefully) social programs. Sounds like a good solution.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      So, no corporations and no individual wealth? Who owns a factory or a datacenter? These are fantastically expensive things. A chip foundry cannot exist under these conditions.

      • Leg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        $999,999,999

        no individual wealth

        I don’t think you have a strong enough concept of large numbers to be able to hold a respectable opinion here.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          You didn’t answer the question though.

          Who owns a factory or a datacenter? These are fantastically expensive things. A chip foundry cannot exist under these conditions.

          • Toine@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            It could be owned by, like, multiple people? Also, a lot of companies in the world, and especially the ones managing costly infrastructure assets, are owned by states (which are a form of “multiple people”).

            • Tankton@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Multiple people working together with 1 goal? Like a … Company?

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  So a company whose ownership is open to the public, with that ownership divided into “shares”. And all the “share” holders can cooperate to decide the direction of the company…what would one call this novel form of organizing a venture…a “cooperation”?

                  • TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Not open to the public. Open to those who actually contribute to it’s operations.

                    And in none of your objections can you justify the CEO pay and the political power they weild. 40x the lowest paid worker, and no more.

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Workers own the factory. Collectively. Through democratic process of any variety.

        • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          In those situations what do the workers that have no interest in owning the means of production do? Like, if you just want to do your job and go home, is there still room for you under that system? Or does it require active participation from every worker?