• DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Historically, most families lived together under one roof (even royalty). It was only in post WWII USA that the idea of each generation having its own home became prevalent.

    • flicker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s always someone who shows up to say that. I bet there’s been one of you every time society advanced. “Historically, having clean water a recent development, and they don’t even have access to clean water in other countries!”

      Same energy as “eat your vegetables, there are starving children somewhere.” And equally useful as a statement when trying to force me to swallow something I despise.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it was a good advancement in society though (aside from suburban sprawl). Having each generation go out and experience life away from where they grew up fosters empathy and understanding through exposure. We should be striving for more of that.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Okay, that doesn’t change the fact that a lot of wealth has been vacuumed out of 90 percent of the country. Even the 90-99 percentile just managed to hold their ground with all of those gains going to the top 1 percent.

      Edit to Add - I wouldn’t be against encouraging multi-generational housing again. But the wealth loss is still there.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Part of that was driven by specialization and people having different jobs and jobs in different locations than their parents though.