kersploosh@sh.itjust.worksM to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 8 months agoWords fail mesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1264arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1256arrow-down1imageWords fail mesh.itjust.workskersploosh@sh.itjust.worksM to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 8 months agomessage-square70fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDeceptichum@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up11·8 months agoThat’s like saying the US wouldn’t fight the confederacy because it would damage their land…
minus-squarewagesj45@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·8 months agoSo then the citizenry and army would be fighting on equal footing then and the “we have all the guns here in Texas” argument goes back to making sense. Either the US uses their overwhelming military power or not, you can’t choose both.
minus-squareDeceptichum@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 months agoNo? Why would you assume it works that way.
That’s like saying the US wouldn’t fight the confederacy because it would damage their land…
So then the citizenry and army would be fighting on equal footing then and the “we have all the guns here in Texas” argument goes back to making sense. Either the US uses their overwhelming military power or not, you can’t choose both.
No?
Why would you assume it works that way.