Opinion: The return to office fallacy | CNN
www.cnn.com
The return-to-office demands make little sense from an overall economic perspective, while working parents, in particular, benefit from not having to waste time commuting to an office, writes Peter Bergen.

The Absurdity of the Return-to-Office Movement::The return-to-office demands make little sense from an overall economic perspective, while working parents, in particular, benefit from not having to waste time commuting to an office, writes Peter Bergen.

  • stoly@lemmy.worldEnglish
    71·
    10 months ago

    It’s so nice to have everything within a 5 block radius. Everything I need is there. No cars, no traffic, just lots of constant exercise and fresh air. When I want to go to a museum, I go to a museum–no gas, driving, parking. When I want to go to a concert, I jump on the subway and go to a concert. But go on, tell us how living in suburbs and breathing the fumes from the car in front of you is better.

    • Blackmist@feddit.ukEnglish
      21·
      10 months ago

      Who said anything about living in the suburbs?

      We didn’t all build our towns wrong.

      • stoly@lemmy.worldEnglish
        21·
        10 months ago

        This isn’t 1980. Cities are really not polluted. Those who live in the suburbs tend to be less healthy due to lack of activity and increased exposure to the pollution emitted from cars.

        • Haha@lemmy.worldEnglish
          11·
          10 months ago

          If you are in the US or EU, maybe? Look at the third words though. This fresh air claim does not apply to everywhere in the world: especially when talking about downtown.