• Treczoks@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just put the device on a separate wifi without internet access, or look at the “child protection” features of your router. Ours can put devices based on their MAC into “access groups” which range from “full access” over “internet from <time> to <time>” to “no internet at all”.

      • Treczoks@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Luckily, most embedded devices lack the smart to attach to two networks at the same time. So you keep it locked into a network where it can only do your bidding, and it won’t listen to anyone else. Unless they built in some very crazy and nefarious code and drive around with network enabled cars in the owners neighborhood.

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          puts on tin foil hat

          https://www.wired.com/2012/05/google-wifi-fcc-investigation/

          Wait, I don’t need a tin foil hat for this… It was national news

          At the point it becomes impossible to buy hardware that doesn’t have a Wi-Fi antenna in it, I’ll get really worried regardless. Tricking a device into connecting to the right wifi network already is so wild, and people shouldn’t have to do that. I’m smart enough to. Not everybody is. Not everybody has the money for an extra router.

          • Treczoks@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Not everybody has the money for an extra router.

            No need for an extra router. I just put those device into the “has no internet access” group. It is one of those “Parental Control” things. Every device inside the net can see and talk to it, but itself cannot talk to anything outside.