• Treczoks@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Luckily, most embedded devices lack the smart to attach to two networks at the same time. So you keep it locked into a network where it can only do your bidding, and it won’t listen to anyone else. Unless they built in some very crazy and nefarious code and drive around with network enabled cars in the owners neighborhood.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        puts on tin foil hat

        https://www.wired.com/2012/05/google-wifi-fcc-investigation/

        Wait, I don’t need a tin foil hat for this… It was national news

        At the point it becomes impossible to buy hardware that doesn’t have a Wi-Fi antenna in it, I’ll get really worried regardless. Tricking a device into connecting to the right wifi network already is so wild, and people shouldn’t have to do that. I’m smart enough to. Not everybody is. Not everybody has the money for an extra router.

        • Treczoks@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not everybody has the money for an extra router.

          No need for an extra router. I just put those device into the “has no internet access” group. It is one of those “Parental Control” things. Every device inside the net can see and talk to it, but itself cannot talk to anything outside.