• Timwi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    No, I don’t think it’s acceptable. But my question wasn’t about me, nor about ethics. There’s no way a train operator with a timetable cares about animal well-being or any other question of ethics. I’m curious what the real reason is.

    • Skipper_the_Eyechild@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Why on earth would a train operator care about timetables over basic ethics? They are human beings, not robots, you know?

      The controller and driver both get paid either way, and I’m sure the train driver is used getting home late on occasion - and I expect they get overtime pay, so he may well be laughing anyway.

      And the controller, or whatever they’re called, will just be seeing it as a PR issue. The slight lost money on the refunds (that passengers actually bother to put through) is easily worth the good PR.

      Edit: Missed random words, impatient brain running too fast for fingers.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      My assumption is our laws don’t allow endangering animals, so perhaps they don’t care from a moral standpoint but they will care about repercussions from the law and also the optics of it.

      Also, if you’ve never been on Uk trains, we don’t need a reason for them being late. They’re oft late.