• fossphi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is this fucking ai generated? Why does this read like SEO garbage

    • kinttach@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      This does read very much like AI-generated content. For example, here’s what Bard generated as an answer to this question.

      It’s the list-based approach, the hyperbole, the too-many adjectives, the writing style that sounds like SEO that makes it sound like AI.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      The double bullet points certainly do suggest it was copied from an AI generated text, but is it inaccurate?

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      AI typically doesnt use hyperbole phrases like “magic” taxi doors, or “fancy” toilets or even Robots “everywhere” unless its specifically trained and asked to do so.

      I think that Ai would be more likely to use accurate descriptors like “Automated taxi doors”, “high-tech toilets” or “robots are commonplace”

        • j4k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          What datasets are reddit based to the point that this directive has meaning? (Genuinely curious)

          I usually use ‘in the style of a graduate student’ or some specific major to improve vocabulary. You have any other fun style directives?