• SCB@lemmy.world
    32·
    11 months ago

    Buying up supply happens because of what I described above.

    If housing isn’t the most reliable investment you can possibly make, then there is less incentive to buy up all the housing.

    This program is fine. Whatever. Every little bit helps and I’m not looking a gift horse in the mouth. But it’s a band-aid on a bullet wound

    We might be tight on supply if we got rid of all of them doing that, but it wouldn’t be a crisis.

    This, however, is flat wrong, because the crisis preceded the investment

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      4·
      11 months ago

      I think you might be having a math problem.

      Corporation Plan

      • Step 1, US has a financial meltdown
      • Step 2, corporations buy up all of the housing at cheap prices, price fix the rentals and use a shit ton of them for airBNBs
      • Step 3, not worry about the empty units or homes because price fixing and airBNBs will fix that
      • Step 4, develop a crowdfunding site so “investors” can get in on the renting/price fixing game
      • Step 5, complain that there isn’t enough housing to get the zoning changed, so they can build “luxury” apartments where they continue to price fix or rent out to tourists/business people because they’re ToTALLy NoT A hoTEl!
      • Step 6, profit, profit, profit

      Common Person Plan

      • Step 1, look to buy a home but there’s not enough supply so the prices go up
      • Step 2, try to save but their rent keeps getting raised because it’s being price fixed and there is a lack of supply (sometimes real because of the tourists)
      • Step 3, continue to rent while nervously waiting to try and build up a deposit and there’s less and less supply
      • Step 4, rent, rent, rent further away from the city core
      • SCB@lemmy.world
        11·
        11 months ago

        I really don’t because the economics here doesn’t change. You’re just trying to moral high-ground economic concepts, which isn’t useful for policy solutions.

        It’s good for rhetoric tho, and we need to change minds, so it’s not a total waste.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          11·
          11 months ago

          You’re just trying to moral high-ground economic concepts, which isn’t useful for policy solutions.

          What moral high ground? It’s easy to fix, make it so corporations can’t own more than a certain amount of units and corporations in general as a percentage of units in a city. If anyone has more than 4 airBNB units, you have to become a hotel. Simple solutions that won’t catch every instance but will make a dent.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            1·
            11 months ago

            “corporations bad” is a moral stance. It’s irrelevant to the underlying economics

            We aren’t debating policy. we agree on policy.