• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Not really any other conclusion? What about the one where the tank that fired at them was too far away to see them clearly but acted without communicating with soldiers who were closer and aware that the journalists weren’t a threat? Apparently that’s less likely than deliberately causing a PR disaster somewhere where there wasn’t even anything controversial going on for the journalists to record.

    • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      When the story first broke the witnesses/journalists said that a couple of drones had hovered over them before they were hit.

      Israel knew damn well they were journalists and didn’t give a shit … because the IDF actively hunts them down and murders them.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      They were on an open hill top with little to no cover, standing around, for an hour. If they were a threat they would have been dealt with in seconds, not a fucking hour.

      Also the Israelis are using optics on their tanks that makes 1km look like it’s just down the street. Hell I had those optics in the US Army 20 years ago.

      Furthermore it wasn’t just the tank. It was a base which means if for some godforsaken reason that tank hasn’t had an optics update since 1970, then they could easily have called over someone with good optics. Hell we have cameras that can see several kilometers. The guy they got on the radio with likely sat in an air conditioned room looking at a TV screen.