For convenience, I gathered a few comments of mine into a blog post.

    • self@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      fuck yes. I can tell already this’ll need more brain than I can give it during work, but from the first few paragraphs this seems like absolutely my kind of shit

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      despite phase shifts being the main cause of the described effects.

      what are the other ones?

      (when i’m thinking about splitter with pi/2 phase shift, i’m thinking about coupled line coupler or its waveguide analogue, but i come from microwave land on this one. maybe this works in fibers?)

      • titotal@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        what are the other ones?

        I guess the rest of the experimental setup that recombines the photon amplitiudes. Like if you put 5 extra beam splitters in the bottom path, there wouldn’t be full destructive interference.

        when i’m thinking about splitter with pi/4 phase shift, i’m thinking about coupled line coupler or its waveguide analogue, but i come from microwave land on this one. maybe this works in fibers?

        I’m not sure how you’d actually build a symmetric beam splitter: wikipedia said you’d need to induce a particular extra phase shift on both transmission and reflection. (I’m fully theoretical physics so I’m not too familiar).