You asked me for evidence. I provided it. And yes, I read it. If you have an issue with a specific study, please explain why. Otherwise, you’re just doubling down on that head in the sand thing, as I predicted.
I would love to have a serious discussion, if you opt to do so.
I’ve already explained my problem with the methodology. That’s where we started this whole conversation. everyone of those studies attributes to livestock some environmental impact that is actually attributed to some other sector or aspect of the agriculture sector. when we give livestock crop seconds or silage or let them graze on otherwise unusable ground, we are conserving resources.
I did read it and, like thousands of others who have reviewed them, I agree with the methodology. I like you, who read an op ed from a beef industry insider and cling to it like religion because you don’t want to stop eating Big Macs.
Then show me where you published your peer-reviewed response. Or show me somebody else’s. You can’t make a claim without evidence. I shared my evidence. Your turn
You asked me for evidence. I provided it. And yes, I read it. If you have an issue with a specific study, please explain why. Otherwise, you’re just doubling down on that head in the sand thing, as I predicted.
I would love to have a serious discussion, if you opt to do so.
I don’t believe you can explain how any of this relates to what we’ve been discussing. I think that you just pulled six links off of Google.
I’ve already explained my problem with the methodology. That’s where we started this whole conversation. everyone of those studies attributes to livestock some environmental impact that is actually attributed to some other sector or aspect of the agriculture sector. when we give livestock crop seconds or silage or let them graze on otherwise unusable ground, we are conserving resources.
TIL deforestation is just clearing unusable ground. Keep it up, this is hilarious.
arguing with a strawman
that isn’t what I said
No, you made an absurd claim with 0 sources. I made many claims with multiple sources. Facts don’t care about your feelings.
I don’t need any sources beyond the ones that I’m refuting. you can read their methodology and see that they’re flawed.
I did read it and, like thousands of others who have reviewed them, I agree with the methodology. I like you, who read an op ed from a beef industry insider and cling to it like religion because you don’t want to stop eating Big Macs.
what oped do you think that I read? I read poor nemechek and came to my own conclusion.
Then show me where you published your peer-reviewed response. Or show me somebody else’s. You can’t make a claim without evidence. I shared my evidence. Your turn
characterizing my claims as absurd is poisoning the well.
Every claim without evidence is absurd.
the evidence is in the study. read it.
Yes, read it please.