• jeffw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, you made an absurd claim with 0 sources. I made many claims with multiple sources. Facts don’t care about your feelings.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t need any sources beyond the ones that I’m refuting. you can read their methodology and see that they’re flawed.

        • jeffw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I did read it and, like thousands of others who have reviewed them, I agree with the methodology. I like you, who read an op ed from a beef industry insider and cling to it like religion because you don’t want to stop eating Big Macs.

            • jeffw@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then show me where you published your peer-reviewed response. Or show me somebody else’s. You can’t make a claim without evidence. I shared my evidence. Your turn

                • jeffw@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m dead. 0 sources to support your argument and misciting logical fallacies

                  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    you don’t seem to understand how scientific reasoning works and you just want to be right. I understand the cognitive dissonance might have driven you mad. maybe you should just take a break for a little while and come back and read this with fresh eyes when you can take the time to understand why poor nemechek use bad methodology and why it should not have been cited the thousands of times it has been since 2018. it has never been confirmed by a separate study.