The commander of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, Admiral Viktor Sokolov, died in Ukraine’s barrage on occupied Crimea last week, Kyiv said Monday.

“After the defeat of the headquarters of the Russian armed forces, 34 officers died, including the commander of the Russian armed forces. Another 105 occupiers were wounded. The headquarters building cannot be restored,” Ukraine’s special operations forces said Monday.

In an initial statement after the attack, the Russian defense ministry said it had shot down five incoming missiles and only one serviceman was killed, though the fleet’s headquarters were damaged.

But rumors about Sokolov’s death circulated online and Ukraine jumped Monday at the chance to confirm the speculation. POLITICO has not independently verified the claims.

The attack was the latest in Ukraine’s quest to liberate occupied Crimea, which Russian President Vladimir Putin seized in 2014. Two weeks ago, Ukraine wrecked a Russian submarine in the port of Sevastopol and also regained control of strategically important oil and gas drilling platforms located in the Black Sea.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Serious question… if the Ukrainians attack Russian assets on Russian soil, there has got to be some red line that could push Putin to consider nukes in retaliation.

    I presume the Ukrainian calculus with this is to remove Russia’s will to fight but do not push so far that Russia becomes afraid for it’s existence.

    “A cornered rat will attack the cat” or something like that.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      This was Crimea, which is certainly territory in contention so fair game.

      Ukraine seems quick to claim responsibility for attacks on their territory, but tries to leave plausible deniability when against Russian territory - it could be Russians doing it and Ukraine only supported them

      • AdamantRatPuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Regardless, drones have reached Moscow. If they wanted to nuke they would have nuked already. What is more likely going to happen is that more Russians will be sent to war.

    • steltek@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most nuclear countries have had conventional conflicts since 1945. Many have lost without (publicly) considering nukes. The closest was the UN vs China in the 50’s and it got MacArthur removed from command for asking.

      • ours@lemmy.film
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        During the Tet Offensive in Vietnam, the US military started a nuclear contingency plan. LBJ shot it down.

    • m0nky@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Stop fear mongering. I guess this account is from a Russian troll farm or something. Well, fuck you, Russia.

    • AdamantRatPuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Once a nuke is used we’re all dead, it doesn’t matter where. In this case the nuke would destroy Russia itself just like it’d wipe us from planet earth. The fear of nukes is being used to scare us into submission, while we’re forgetting the implications of nukes.